Are the Seahawks really open to trading Richard Sherman? A longtime NFL exec thinks so.
Could the Seahawks really be open to trading star cornerback Richard Sherman?
They very well could be, according to longtime NFL executive Michael Lombardi, who now works for TheRinger.com and made that claim during a podcast posted Thursday — an undoubtedly provocative claim that quickly made the typical rounds of NFL social media.
In the podcast, Lombardi — most recently an assistant to the coaching staff of the Patriots from 2014-16 and before that the general manager of the Browns for two years — says “I truly believe, based on what I hear around the National Football League, that the Seahawks would, in fact, for the right deal, trade Richard Sherman.’’
But as is often the case when it comes to the NFL and rumors and social media, the context in which it was said is important (let alone detailing what “the right deal” means).
Most Read Sports Stories
- Ichiro announces his retirement after Mariners’ final game in Japan WATCH
- UW Huskies, coach Mike Hopkins agree to six-year, $17.5 million contract extension
- Ichiro, always a master of timing, gets it right again with his retirement | Larry Stone
- Analysis: Re-ranking the Seahawks' positions of need following the first wave of free agency
- Mariners send Ichiro off with extra-innings win in final Japan game vs. A's VIEW
Lombardi threw out that claim in a discussion of the New Orleans Saints’ pursuit of New England cornerback Malcolm Butler, making the argument that the Saints might be better off simply trading for an established cornerback like Sherman, noting that the Saints want to emulate Seattle’s defense.
What’s further interesting is that Lombardi doesn’t cite Seattle’s apparent willingness to entertain the idea for the reason many might think — the odd year Sherman had in 2016 when he had two on-field blowups aimed at coaches as well as an increasingly testy relationship with local media.
Instead, Lombardi says the Seahawks might simply think trading Sherman would be the best way to free up what he says is some much-needed salary cap space.
“Their cap is kind of a mess and they need to fix it,” Lombardi said.
Sherman has two years remaining on his contract, with a $13.6 million cap number in 2017 — the second-highest on the team behind the $18.8 million of quarterback Russell Wilson; and $13.2 million in 2018, third-highest behind Wilson ($21.7 million) and linebacker Bobby Wagner ($13.6 million).
Lombardi’s thesis is that cornerbacks are not really worth quite that much and that dealing Sherman would be the best way for the Seahawks to create cap space. “The corner is not really the most important player in their scheme, it’s the front seven,” he said. Lombardi also cites Sherman’s age — he’ll be 29 on March 30 — as another factor that could compel Seattle to consider a trade.
Sherman signed his current deal with Seattle — a four-year, $56 million extension — in the spring of 2014 in the wake of the Super Bowl.
Lombardi states Seattle was hesitant to do the deal then.
“I think Seattle really thought twice about paying Richard Sherman,” he said. “They felt they had to when they won the Super Bowl. Now their cap is kind of a mess and they need to fix it. The reason they need to fix it is because they put all that money in the corner position in a defense when we feel like you can draft players to fit that scheme.”
What’s interesting about that is Seattle ranks only eighth in cornerback spending for 2017, according to OvertheCap.com, despite Sherman having a contract that on a per-year basis is the fifth-highest in the NFL. Seattle would move up to fifth in 2018 when not only does Sherman’s cap hit increase some but so does Jeremy Lane’s to $7.5 million (though just $2.5 million of that is dead money, which will lead to lots of speculation about the future of Lane depending on how the 2017 season develops).
So while Seattle is paying its corners quite a bit, they aren’t the only ones doing so.
But the idea that corners are overpaid in the defense is an interesting theory to maybe consider given the dropoff in production of the Seattle secondary in 2016 after the injury to Earl Thomas — did that prove it’s Thomas who is really the most valuable piece of the puzzle?
Regardless, the overall point is the comment was made in a discussion that was more nuanced than simply the Twitterized version of “Seattle wants to dump Richard Sherman.”
You might not expect a team to ever admit publicly it was thinking of trading a star player, but for what it’s worth both Seahawks general manager John Schneider and head coach Pete Carroll were asked about Sherman and his future at the NFL Combine two weeks ago and each shrugged at the idea there was any reason to talk about it.
“He’s an elite player,’’ Schneider said. “I think everybody has bad days, you know. Congratulations if you don’t. But he’s — we love him. He’s an elite player.’’
Carroll likewise said he was confident the long off-season would allow Sherman to put his media issues from last season in the rearview mirror.
Will Seattle someday be in Sherman’s rearview mirror?
While Lombardi’s statement is obviously attention-getting, he hardly seems to be saying anything to compel you to sell your No 25 jersey just yet.