NEW YORK (AP) — Naomi Osaka began the U.S. Open having never made it past the fourth round of a Grand Slam tournament and seeded 20th. She also arrived with big goals.
“It would be really sad if I kept playing for years and my biggest goal was to get to the quarters of a Slam,” she announced after her first-round victory. “I think everyone plays Slams to win, especially the younger players now.”
Look at her now. Two weeks later, the 20-year-old is, indeed, a major champion, thoroughly outplaying and beating her idol, Serena Williams, while keeping her composure during as chaotic a Grand Slam final as anyone can recall.
Now, as thoughts turn to 2019, there’s no reason to think Osaka won’t have more in store. She is at the forefront of the next generation in women’s tennis, someone possessing quite a mixture of powerful serve and strokes, enviable court speed and a preternatural calm.
Most Read Sports Stories
- Instant analysis: Three impressions from the UW Huskies' 45-19 win over BYU VIEW
- 'He's an NFL quarterback': Jacob Eason was at his finest against BYU — and others took notice | Larry Stone
- Sports on TV & radio: Local listings for Seattle games and events
- Gardner Minshew isn't the Northwest's first out-of-nowhere sports story, but he may be the best | Matt Calkins
- Huskies GameCenter: Live updates, how to watch No. 22 UW's road test against BYU Cougars
Or at least she appears to never get rattled on court.
But ask her what she felt like Saturday morning before the final.
“I woke up and I was sweating. I was so nervous. My heart was racing, like, the entire day,” Osaka said.
She spoke via a video chat with her sister, who told Osaka to think of the match against Williams as just another match.
“Are you crazy?!” was Osaka’s reply. “It’s a Grand Slam final!”
It was her first. And now she’s the first player from Japan to win one. Osaka was born there, to a Japanese mother and Haitian father, and moved to New York at age 3. Now she’s based in Florida.
Osaka was the biggest revelation at this U.S. Open — who could be surprised at Novak Djokovic winning his 14th major championship Sunday? — but plenty else happened over what undoubtedly was as wild a Grand Slam tournament as there’s been in years.
Here is what else we learned:
TENNIS NEEDS CHANGES
The whole clash between Williams and chair umpire Carlos Ramos showed that there are inconsistencies with officiating and questions about the place of coaching. That Williams lost a point, then a game, and was fined $17,000 are what will be remembered about that final.
DJOKOVIC IS BACK
Djokovic’s second major title in a row, after Wimbledon in July, signaled fully that he is once again at the height of his powers. His coach, Marian Vajda, said Djokovic peaked from the quarterfinals on, and it’s tough to argue. He claimed the last 16 sets he played. This follows a two-year Slam drought for the 31-year-old Serb, who suddenly is tied with Pete Sampras for the third-most major trophies by a man, trailing only Roger Federer’s 20 and Rafael Nadal’s 17.
SO IS DEL POTRO
He didn’t win the title, but Juan Martin del Potro got back to a major final for the first time since his triumph at Flushing Meadows in 2009. After years of struggles and time away because of four wrist operations, his rebuilt backhand and strong-as-ever forehand make him, once again, someone to consider a contender.
EXPECT THE UNEXPECTED
There was so much to talk about. Simona Halep’s loss, the first by a No. 1 seed in the first round at the U.S. Open. The suffocating heat and humidity, which prompted the U.S. Tennis Association to create and apply rules on the fly. Chair umpire Mohamed Lahyani’s impromptu counseling session with Nick Kyrgios (not allowed). The flap over the chair umpire who told Alize Cornet she couldn’t change her shirt on court (allowed). Federer’s jaw-dropping, around-the-net-post trick shot against Kyrgios in the third round. Federer’s five-set loss to 55th-ranked John Millman in the fourth. Victories that finished after 2 a.m. for 2014 champ Marin Cilic (against 19-year-old Alex de Minaur) and Nadal (against Dominic Thiem.) Nadal’s retirement from his semifinal against del Potro because of an injured right knee.
Follow Howard Fendrich on Twitter at http://twitter.com/HowardFendrich
More AP tennis coverage: https://www.apnews.com/tag/apf-Tennis and https://twitter.com/AP_Sports