The Seattle City Council, in a 6-3 vote Monday, repealed regulations it approved just months ago for app-dispatched ride services like uberX and Lyft.
With hopes of ending a year-and-a-half-long debate over how to fairly and safely regulate all ride services, including taxis and for-hire vehicles, most if not all council members hinted they were ready to approve another set of carefully negotiated rules as soon as next Monday.
Mayor Ed Murray drafted the proposal that the council is expected to vote on next week. The threat of a fall referendum or initiative overturning the council’s legislation motivated the mayor’s office to spend almost two months negotiating with representatives of Uber, which operates uberX; Lyft; taxis; and for-hire companies.
The new rules would increase insurance requirements for uberX and Lyft — legally referred to as transportation network companies (TNCs). But unlike the previous City Council regulations approved March 17, the new ordinance would allow the services to put as many drivers on the road at a time as they want. The regulations repealed Monday would have limited each of the services to 150 drivers on the road at a time.
Most Read Local Stories
- Man arrested, accused of stealing Seattle police officer's vehicle after she was fatally struck while helping at crash scene
- Washington is the country's worst offender when it comes to using too much jargon
- Washington is tantalizingly close to a 'near return to normal,' but COVID risks are staying higher in some areas
- Here's who won the second $250,000 prize in Washington's COVID-19 vaccine lottery
- 'We have someone being murdered,' said Kent 911 caller. 52 minutes later when police arrived, a woman was near death
Councilmember Sally Clark thanked Murray for pushing negotiations with Uber and Lyft further than the council was able to before it took action. Clark said that when the council sought more information and compromise, on insurance policies in particular, “nobody blinked.”
“We passed the best legislation that the council was able to put together at the time,” Clark said at Monday’s council meeting.
Several members of the for-hire and taxi industry supported the repeal and favored approval of the new ordinance, as much as some aspects of the new rules pain them. The city would still limit how many taxis and for-hire vehicles can be on the road, but would release another 200 taxi licenses over the next four years. The city has not released any new taxi licenses since at least 1990.
For-hire companies would be allowed to provide street-hailed rides everywhere except designated downtown taxi stands.
“It’s been a long process, and it’s time to move along,” said Eastside for Hire general manager Samatar Guled during the meeting’s public-comment period. “I think we can live with it.”
Three council members — Mike O’Brien, Nick Licata and Kshama Sawant — voted to delay the repeal for another week, pending a court decision expected Tuesday that could render the threat of a referendum or initiative moot. Other council members, eager to at least temporarily end deliberation on the issue for the first time since March 2013, voted against that motion.
“I would like to signal to the industry that we are serious about a solution,” said Councilmember Sally Bagshaw.
King County is expected to discuss and move forward with similar rules later this year.
Alexa Vaughn: firstname.lastname@example.org