A new online map lets Seattle residents zoom in on the range of natural hazards that threaten their homes, hangouts and workplaces.
Seattle is graced with spectacular scenery, but that beauty comes at a price.
The natural forces that forged mountains, carved Puget Sound and nurtured some of the world’s lushest forests also expose the region to a jackpot of natural disasters.
Earthquakes? You bet.
Landslides? In spades.
Most Read Stories
- ‘Suddenly there is a Confederate flag flying’ in Seattle’s Greenwood area – well, not quite
- Within minutes of each other, state Senate and House agree to shield many of their records from the public
- Meteorologists expect up to an inch of snow Friday in Seattle as cold-weather records fall
- Former Huskies star Markelle Fultz received $10K from sports agent before arriving at UW, report says
- Massive container cranes, welded to a ship, will cruise through Puget Sound Friday: here's how to watch WATCH
Government agency shelves — both real and virtual — are crammed with reports on vulnerabilities, high-risk zones and response plans. But it’s not easy to sort though the jargon and figure out what it means for your home, neighborhood or workplace.
If you want to know whether your office or apartment building sits on soil that will turn to goo in a major earthquake, just click on the “liquefaction” tab and zoom. Other overlays show areas vulnerable to flooding, landslides and quake-triggered tsunamis.
For earthquakes, the Seattle Natural Hazard Explorer relies on U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) modeling of how the earth will shake in different parts of town based on the underlying geology. Capitol Hill is expected to rattle more than Lake City, for example. Neighborhoods like Interbay, SoDo and Harbor Island will be pummeled the hardest.
The project is an indirect spinoff from this summer’s gripping New Yorker article, “The Really Big One,” said Matt Auflick, outreach coordinator for emergency management. The story didn’t mince words in describing the impact on the Pacific Northwest of a Cascadia Subduction Zone megaquake and tsunami, and sent worried Seattleites flocking to public-information sessions and home retrofit classes.
At those events, Auflick brought along maps from the 300-page Seattle Hazard Identification and Vulnerability Analysis, and found that participants gravitated toward them.
“Everybody wants to see where their house is,” he said. “It just makes it more real to them.”
The Seattle Natural Hazards Explorer is designed to eliminate the need to wade through hundreds of pages by presenting the information in an easy-to-understand and graphic way.
“The idea is to take the information and make it more accessible — and hopefully get people thinking about preparedness as well,” Auflick said.
(Seattle’s Department of Planning and Development has a similar online map, but doesn’t include the full grab bag of natural disasters.)
The maps are no substitute for detailed geotechnical analyses at specific sites. But the more the public knows about relative hazard levels across the city, the better equipped they will be to make decisions, said former King County emergency management director Eric Holdeman
“People who live in hazard areas shouldn’t be fearful,” he said. “They should become better prepared for disasters.”
And for those who plan to relocate their households or businesses in the future, the hazard maps can add another dimension of data to consider.
Rents might be lower near Pioneer Square, but the soil is prone to liquefaction in many places and the neighborhood has a high concentration of old buildings that aren’t likely to stand up to a major quake, Holdeman pointed out. Waterfront bluffs offer sweeping views, but a high risk of landslides.
“I’d like to see the state require sellers to declare what the risks are for property that they are putting up for sale,” Holdeman said. “Then it is up to the people to decide their risk tolerance.”
The new tool is a way citizens can inform themselves, but it’s still a work in progress, Auflick said.
Some of the information is so technical it’s hard to simplify. The USGS earthquake maps, for example, illustrate the level of ground-shaking that has a 10 percent chance of occurring in the next 50 years, expressed as a fraction of the force of gravity.
Got it? If not, the Natural Hazards Explorer includes sidebars with explanations, more information, photos and videos. One animation shows the expected path of a Puget Sound tsunami generated by a quake on the Seattle Fault. (A tsunami generated by a quake on the offshore Cascadia Subduction Zone would be devastating on the Pacific Coast, but isn’t expected to cause serious damage in Puget Sound.)
The city hopes to keep building on the tool, Auflick said. Information on bridges, roads and other infrastructure likely to be damaged in a quake could be added, as could data on neighborhoods with large numbers of elders and other vulnerable groups.