The Seattle City Council voted Tuesday to override Mayor Jenny Durkan’s vetoes of council bills meant to start shrinking the police force and scaling up community solutions this year. Council members chose to stick with the 2020 budget bills instead of a substitute proposal that the mayor had said she could accept.
The veto-override votes on the three bills were preceded by more than an hour of public comments, with most speakers urging council members to “hold the line” against the mayor and demonstrate they were listening to the Black Lives Matter movement. Several council members then sharply defended the bills as reasonable first steps toward revamping public safety in Seattle.
Councilmembers Alex Pedersen and Debora Juarez dissented on one of three veto overrides; the other two overrides were unanimous.
“Countless videos of Black and brown lives lost here in Seattle and across the country shows us that not everyone feels safe in our community, and not everyone is safe,” Council President M. Lorena González said, referring to people killed by police officers. “We need public safety that’s centered on harm reduction, not the status quo.”
She added, “When I look back in this moment of time, I want to be able to tell my daughter, who I’m currently holding in my arms, that I did the right thing and that I voted on the right side of history.”
The budget bills passed by the council and vetoed by Durkan last month included provisions meant to reduce the police force by up to 100 officers through layoffs and attrition; cut the wages of police commanders; dismantle a city Navigation Team that clears certain homeless encampments; borrow $14 million to fund community-based public-safety programs; and use $3 million in emergency reserves to fund a community-led public-safety research project.
Councilmember Dan Strauss described the changes as “too important to stop and play political games.” Councilmember Tammy Morales read aloud the names of people killed by Seattle police in recent years. She said the council’s bills were built on work by community organizers.
Councilmember Kshama Sawant credited “ferocious” pressure by the Black Lives Matter movement in recent days for Tuesday’s result, noting several colleagues kept constituents in suspense until the last minute.
Durkan and council members have clashed for months over how to rework a 2020 city budget ravaged by the COVID-19 crisis, and how to respond to the uprising for Black lives that erupted after Minneapolis police killed George Floyd.
Some council members, heeding calls from protesters and community coalitions, pressed to defund the Police Department and invest more in approaches less likely to result in harm. As business groups, the Seattle Police Officers Guild and residents skeptical of such changes spoke out, Durkan cited her own concerns in calling for the council to slow down. Police Chief Carmen Best abruptly retired earlier this month rather than carry out layoffs.
Tuesday’s decision at a special remote meeting was partly about how the city spends money the rest of this year. But the decision also was about who’s in the driver’s seat at City Hall, with another round of deliberations starting soon. Seattle’s 2021 budget could help determine how the city handles public safety in the long term, and Durkan is scheduled to unveil her plan next week.
Durkan came under fire this summer for the Police Department’s use of tear gas, blast balls and other heavy-handed crowd-control tactics, and she’s been battling a recall attempt in court. Sawant is meanwhile also facing a recall attempt, partly for letting protesters into City Hall during a pandemic.
Leading up to Tuesday’s meeting, council members were taking heat from constituents on both sides. The Seattle chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America organized a rally at a park near Councilmember Andrew Lewis’ Queen Anne apartment building, hoping a 11th-hour push would convince him to oppose Durkan. A group called Move Seattle Forward, associated with the Downtown Seattle Association, thanked supporters for sending 1,000 pro-veto emails to council members last week.
The council’s public comment session was dominated by defunding proponents. “We need you to stand with Black lives, not Jenny Durkan,” public commenter Evelyn Chow told council members.
Though the council’s bills were expected to immediately slice only about $3 million from the Police Department’s $400-plus million annual budget — nowhere close to the 50% that seven council members in July vowed to extract — the council members described the trims as a crucial “down payment” on more sweeping changes to come. They asked the Durkan administration to seek an exception allowing the officer layoffs to occur based on misconduct rather than seniority.
“Today, we are encouraged to see the City Council, emboldened by the support of tens of thousands of BIPOC (Black, Indigenous and people of color) community members, resist Mayor Durkan’s bullying tactics and anti-Black obstructionism,” Decriminalize Seattle and King County Equity Now said in a statement, referring to the council’s Police Department cuts as modest.
“As we head into the 2021 budget cycle, we expect council members to maintain their conviction, elevate Black lives, and uphold their public commitments to divest from policing and reinvest in Black communities,” the community coalitions added.
Durkan warned the council’s layoffs could result in new recruits, including young officers of color, being let go. She objected to shutting down the Navigation Team and opposed using a loan for the public-safety programs.
The Downtown Seattle Association expressed disappointment in the veto overrides, arguing the council’s moves “won’t result in real police reform” and could compromise public safety.
“The council needs to listen to constituents from across the city, not just those who choose to gather outside their front doors,” the association said.
In a statement before Tuesday’s overrides, the mayor attributed her concerns to inadequate plans from the council for responding to 911 calls with a smaller police force, addressing homeless encampments without the Navigation Team and repaying the loan.
“While council may not be concerned about the details, I am. And they actually do matter,” Durkan said.
On Monday, González called Tuesday’s meeting to address the vetoes and said she would personally vote to override them. Anticipating some of her colleagues might side with the mayor, she unveiled a potential substitute. While the council allocates city funds, the mayor can choose to spend those funds or not, she noted.
González described the substitute proposal Monday as a possible compromise negotiated with Durkan, while Decriminalize Seattle and King County Equity Now said it would amount to capitulation. The council president said Tuesday the proposal was merely a “backup plan,” needed in case the mayor’s vetoes were sustained.
Under the substitute proposal disclosed Monday, there would have been no layoffs this year; the police commanders would have kept their wages; the Navigation Team would have remained intact; community-based public safety programs would have received $2.5, rather than $14 million; and the research project would have received $1 million this year, rather than $3 million.
Several council members Tuesday said they were theoretically open to a deal with Durkan but thought the substitute proposal conceded too much. They said they hoped to work better with the mayor on next year’s budget.
“One of our shared responsibilities is to find common ground,” said Durkan, vowing to include $100 million in housing, education and other investments for communities of color in her 2021 budget plan next week and promising to improve homeless encampment outreach.
“Even when we disagree, I have always believed we could work together on actual solutions that can be done and make the change we want to see.”
The mayor and council already have agreed that certain functions, such as the city’s 911 call center and its parking enforcement unit, should be moved outside the Police Department.
Editor’s note: The commenting thread on this story has been closed due to too many comments that violate our Code of Conduct.
The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only and do not reflect the opinions of The Seattle Times.