Tim Eyman and signature-gathering firm Citizen Solutions have been in contempt since February for not handing over all the documents sought by the Washington Attorney General's Office.
OLYMPIA — A Thurston County judge has doubled the daily contempt-of-court fines against Tim Eyman and his associates in the state’s lawsuit against the initiative activist.
Friday’s order by Superior Court Judge James Dixon marks the latest twist in several years’ worth of scrutiny of Eyman’s campaign activities.
Eyman and Citizen Solutions have been in contempt since February for not handing over all the relevant documents sought by the state, according to a statement by the state Attorney General’s Office.
Dixon’s order boosts the fines levied on the defendants to a combined $1,000 per day. Eyman and Citizen Solutions have now racked up $101,500 in fines, with another $35,722 for related court costs and fees, the statement from the Attorney General’s Office said.
Most Read Local Stories
- 'Sorry for what happened to Mr. Gray': DSHS to pay $8M after neighbors' pleas to help vulnerable Seattle man brought no action
- Low snowpack, hot spring lead to drought declaration for nearly half of Washington state
- Ron & Don Nation, rejoice! Popular radio personalities turn to podcast and real estate
- West Seattle man sentenced to 25 years for raping woman who suffered a stroke after car crash
- What an Olympic medalist, homeless in Seattle, wants you to know
Last year, the Attorney General’s Office filed a $2.1 million lawsuit against Eyman and Citizen Solutions, a signature-gathering firm. The suit alleges that Eyman enriched himself with money given to initiative campaigns and also directed money donated for one proposed ballot measure to a different initiative campaign.
The lawsuit stems from a 2015 complaint investigation by the state Public Disclosure Commission that alleged Eyman in 2012 improperly used money raised for Initiative 1185 to promote Initiative 517.
I-1185 sought to reinstate a law requiring a two-thirds vote of the Legislature to hike taxes. It passed that year, but the state Supreme Court struck it down. I-517, which voters did not approve, was geared toward boosting the power of initiative groups and would have given campaigns six additional months to collect petition signatures.
In a fundraising letter he sent earlier this month seeking help with legal fees, Eyman called the lawsuit a “witch hunt” and a “political jihad against me …”
Eyman wrote that more than a decade of his tax returns, phone records and bank statements, and “literally millions of emails and documents on my computer” have been reviewed for the lawsuit.
“No matter how much we give them, they always ask for more,” he wrote. “When you’re the target of a government lawsuit like this, whether you’re innocent or guilty, saint or sinner, the result is the same: the process is the punishment.”
But in a September legal filing, the Attorney General’s Office accused Eyman of repeatedly ignoring directions to hand over bank statements, “despite being given every opportunity to comply.”
That filing contended that some documents recently made available by Eyman may point to other financial records the state hasn’t received.
“Documents recently produced by Defendant Eyman reveal that he solicited and received unreported contributions, some of which were funneled through Citizen Solutions and its associates,” according to the filing.
Mark Lamb, attorney for William Agazarm, an officer of Citizen Solutions, said Monday his client did nothing wrong.
“He was willing to testify and the state chose to cancel the deposition, and he looks forward to clearing his name,” said Lamb, who had previously represented Eyman in the case.
In a statement, Attorney General Bob Ferguson said that Eyman and Citizen Solutions were trying “to avoid accountability for their intentional campaign finance violations.” Added Ferguson: “It won’t work.”