While he stays mum, local Democratic officials are downplaying the rumor that Howard Schultz might join the 2016 presidential race.

Share story

In what’s becoming a seasonal tradition nearly as predictable as the pumpkin-spice latte, the name of Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz has again been floated as a potential presidential candidate.

Starbucks is staying officially mum, but state Democratic operatives said they’re skeptical, and there’s been no sign that the politically engaged coffee titan is planning to stir the 2016 presidential pot.

Update: Howard Schultz says he has “no intention” to run for president

The latest cup of chatter was brewed up in the Sunday New York Times, where columnist Maureen Dowd wrote that “potent friends of America’s lord of latte” have been pressing him to join the Democratic primary.

The buzz spread on the Internet, with conservative news aggregator Drudge Report playing up the potential challenge to front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Quiz: How many of the 2016 presidential candidates can you name?

Are you good with names at parties? Because we've got a lot of names and two parties here.

Starbucks wouldn’t comment and did not make Schultz available for an interview this week.

Schultz has repeatedly batted down such rumors, which also arose before the 2012 election. In February, he told Time magazine he was not interested and lacked the correct temperament to run for office. “I don’t think that is a solution. I don’t think it ends well,” he told the magazine.

Jaxon Ravens, chair of the Washington State Democratic Party, said he has not heard any buzz about Schultz considering a presidential bid. “It’s not hitting the radar,” he said.

Since reclaiming the helm of a struggling Starbucks in 2008, Schultz has increasingly thrown the heft of the coffee giant behind social and policy issues dear to his heart, from gridlock in Washington, D.C., to the plight of returning veterans, even as he turned the company around.

It’s been a rare departure from the typical corporate script for the CEO of a publicly traded company, and analysts say that investors go along with it because Starbucks’ results have been spectacular.

Some of its well-publicized moves — such as an initiative to subsidize college for legions of U.S. baristas, cast against the backdrop of rising inequality and mounting college costs — have helped make Starbucks more attractive as an employer. More recently, the company launched a campaign to employ and train disadvantaged youth.

It hasn’t always gone well: A bid in March to encourage baristas to talk about race relations in the empire’s coffee shops was widely panned.

Schultz is not known for being particularly involved in politics in Washington state. He has donated periodically to Democratic candidates. He hosted a fundraiser at his home for John Edwards’ 2008 presidential campaign. After Edwards flamed out in an infidelity scandal, Schultz donated to Clinton and Barack Obama’s 2008 campaigns.

It’s not clear the coffee magnate would even have a firm Washington state constituency. He is reviled by some local sports fans for selling the Seattle SuperSonics to a group of Oklahoma businessmen in 2006. The team moved to Oklahoma City two years later.

“He would have a hard time carrying Washington because a lot of people think he is the one who lost the Sonics,” said Paul Berendt, a former state Democratic Party chairman and Clinton supporter.

Ravens called Schultz smart and accomplished but said, “We’ve got some great people running already and the clock is ticking.”

Many Democratic activists in the state already are lining up behind Clinton or Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who is visiting Seattle for a pair of political rallies Saturday.

Ravens said he’s heard no hue and cry among Democrats for a billionaire business executive to lead their party’s ticket.

“Nobody has come to me and said ‘Jaxon Ravens, I wish we had a corporate CEO running as a Democrat for president,’ ” he said.