The Senate's vote to approve a clean-power bill, and passage in the House of another climate bill, marked a pair of rare wins for the governor's climate agenda in the Washington state Legislature.

Share story

OLYMPIA — As Gov. Jay Inslee declared his presidential bid Friday, the Washington Senate passed a clean-power bill strongly championed by the governor.

The 28-19 Senate vote to approve Senate Bill 5116 — and Friday’s passage in the House of HB 1112, another proposal sought by Inslee — marked a pair of rare wins for the governor’s climate agenda in the Washington Legislature.

Sponsored by Sen. Reuven Carlyle, D-Seattle, at the request of the governor, SB 5116 would require the state’s utilities to stop using coal-generated electricity by the end of 2025. It would also set a goal to make Washington utilities carbon-free by 2045.

“We’re setting a pathway that’s real, measurable and specific and tangible to get the rest of our electricity grid off fossil fuels,” said Carlyle. He added later: “It’s a big step forward, by any standard.”

Sen. Tim Sheldon of Potlatch, Mason County, a conservative Democrat who caucuses with Republicans, joined Democrats in approving the bill on an otherwise party-line vote.

The bill is scheduled for a Tuesday committee hearing in the House.

Meanwhile, the House on Friday afternoon passed HB 1112. Sponsored by Rep. Joe Fitzgibbon, D-West Seattle, it would phase out the use of hydrofluorocarbons in equipment such as industrial refrigeration units.

In a statement celebrating the bill’s passage, Fitzgibbon called the legislation necessary “because we cannot rely on the federal government to act on climate by regulating pollutants.”

For Inslee, who has long made climate change the center of his political career, the twin victories represented a big shift. The governor has for years watched his ambitious clean-energy proposals — such as a carbon cap-and-trade program and a proposed carbon fee — fail to gain traction at the Legislature. Meanwhile, voters rejected carbon-fee ballot measures in 2016 and 2018.

The Senate took to the floor just hours after Inslee released a video announcing his bid for the Democratic nomination for president in 2020. His message focused solely on tackling climate change, and included clips of the governor discussing the issue over the decades.

Republicans on Friday protested both bills, with some trying to cast doubt on the human-caused effects of climate change. Others expressed concern that the phaseout of hydrofluorocarbons could hurt agricultural and other industries in Eastern Washington.

Sen. Curtis King, R-Yakima, called the clean-power bill a poor approach to reducing carbon — and one that would ultimately raise electricity costs.

“This bill is going to raise the cost of energy to everybody,” said King in a floor speech. “It’s going to raise the cost of energy to the low-income, those that can least afford it.”

Sen. Doug Ericksen, R-Ferndale and a frequent Inslee critic, this week called the 100-percent power plan an “aspirational goal based on a campaign promise that sounded good on a slogan but really doesn’t make any sense in public policy.”

Friday’s votes don’t end the clean-power debate at the Legislature, even among Democrats.

The state House has been working on an even stronger clean-power proposal for hitting the 2045 carbon-free deadline. In contrast, Carlyle’s bill allows flexibility for some utilities to draw power from natural-gas plants that produce greenhouse-gas emissions, even after that deadline.

In addition to the clean-power and hydrofluorocarbons proposals, Inslee and Democrats are pushing bills to reduce the carbon content of transportation fuels, boost energy conservation for buildings and increase use of electric vehicles.

The governor has said those bills would add up to roughly the same amount of carbon reduction as his legislation in recent years to enact a carbon fee or a carbon cap-and-trade system.

With their first big House and Senate majorities in years, Democrats have put clean energy at the forefront of this year’s to-do list.

Even with those bigger majorities this year, however, the transportation-fuels proposal may not have the votes to get to the governor’s desk. Some worry that proposal would raise fuel costs.

Sen. Steve Hobbs, D-Lake Stevens, said he opposed the clean-fuel standards because it could increase the price of gas “but brings nothing back to the state of Washington.”

“A low-carbon fuel standard is not going to build a single ferry, it’s not going to build a [fish] culvert, it’s not going to address any of our transportation needs in the state of Washington,” said Hobbs. “And environmental needs.”

Hobbs this year is proposing an infrastructure package funded partly through a carbon fee.