“Western monarchs probably won’t be around as we know them in another 35 years,” said Cheryl Schultz, an associate professor at Washington State University, Vancouver, and lead author of a new study.
KENNEWICK — Children in the Northwest might not see the fluttering orange and black wings of a monarch butterfly on a summer day a few decades from now.
A study published recently in the journal Biological Conservation documents the steep decline of migrating monarchs in the West.
“This study doesn’t just show that there are fewer monarchs now than 35 years ago,” said Cheryl Schultz, an associate professor at Washington State University, Vancouver, and lead author of the study.
“It also tells us that, if things stay the same, western monarchs probably won’t be around as we know them in another 35 years,” she said.
Most Read Stories
- It looked ugly on TV, but Doug Baldwin’s uncontrolled emotion helped Seahawks beat Giants
- ICE agents arrest man inside Oregon house without warrant
- I-5’s Uncle Sam billboard: 50 years and still ticked off near Chehalis
- Bicyclist sues King County after accident left him quadriplegic
- Instant analysis: Three thoughts from the Seahawks' romp over the Giants at MetLife Stadium
The study puts the risk at 72 percent that not enough of the monarchs will be migrating in the West within 20 years to sustain the population. In 50 years, the risk rises to 86 percent.
More is known about the larger population of eastern monarchs, which also is in decline.
The study led by Schultz showed western monarchs faring worse than monarchs in the East.
Western monarchs that breed in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Nevada and California head south for the winter to roost in clusters on eucalyptus and pine along the California coast.
Coastal residents began noticing in the 1990s that there didn’t seem to be as many monarchs as there were in previous decades. Hundreds of volunteers began collecting data to learn more in an annual Thanksgiving count of hundreds of California roosting sites in 1997.
That data was the starting point for the new study.
Schultz used newer statistical methods to combine the Xerces Society’s Thanksgiving Count data from 1997 to 2006 with more sparse data collected by amateurs and professionals back to the early 1980s.
Researchers were surprised by the rate of decline.
In the 1980s, about 10 million monarch butterflies were spending the winter on the California coast. Now, 300,000 monarch butterflies are estimated to roost across hundreds of coastal sites, the study found.
“We know there is a trend now,” Schultz said. “Now we have to figure out how to reverse it.”
She said possible culprits may be those identified in the East — a loss of breeding and wintering habitat, pesticide use and possibly climate change.
In overwintering areas, the threat to habitat is development and the aging of trees where monarchs roost.
In breeding areas, their fate is tied to milkweed, where monarchs lay their eggs and their yellow-, black- and white-striped caterpillars feed on the plant’s leaves.
But the amount of milkweed is declining. It’s less likely to remain at the margins of fields and in the rows within orchards because of both herbicide use and the ability to extend fields to the edges of property.
The reasons for decline may be more complicated than just the loss of habitat.
Schultz and another author of the study, Emma Pelton of the Xerces Society in Portland, recently hiked in the Umatilla National Wildlife Refuge to look for monarch butterflies and caterpillars in stands of milkweed.
The refuge “has vast areas of milkweed and not many monarchs,” Schultz said.
That might be because there is more to the migrating monarchs’ biology than the milkweed plant, she said. Or maybe not enough monarchs are overwintering to make it back to the refuge in large quantities.
Eventually the grandchildren or great-grandchildren are making their way back to the Mid-Columbia, but they are not filling the area, Schultz said.
The study she is working on is to understand where and when monarchs are breeding in the West.
It is paid for by the Department of Defense, which is interested in how it could manage its Western land to balance needs such as training with natural-resources protection.
The study published recently was paid for by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which is considering whether to list the monarch butterfly as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act.
“In the 20th century, we brought bald eagles back from the brink of extinction by limiting use of DDT,” said Elizabeth Crone, a Tufts University professor and study co-author. “If we start now, we can make the 21st century the era in which monarchs return to our landscapes.”