The Puget Soundkeeper Alliance alleges polluted stormwater from the LRI Landfill discharges into the waterway, known both as Muck Creek and South Creek, as well as its unnamed tributary and wetlands next to the facility.
A Graham-area landfill has been illegally polluting a nearby tributary of the Nisqually River for years, according to an environmental advocacy group’s lawsuit.
The Puget Soundkeeper Alliance alleges polluted stormwater from the LRI Landfill discharges into the waterway, known both as Muck Creek and South Creek, as well as its unnamed tributary and wetlands adjacent to the facility.
“This is a small waterway that supports native runs of chum, coho and steelhead,” as well as cutthroat trout, Puget Soundkeeper Alliance staff attorney Katelyn Kinn said. “This is a waterway that is really well worth protecting, and our community needs it to be healthy.”
In recent years, the pollution from the business at 30919 Meridian E. has exceeded what’s allowed by its permits and the federal Clean Water Act, according to the lawsuit filed Sept. 11 in U.S. District Court in Tacoma.
Most Read Local Stories
- Coronavirus daily news update, April 6: What to know today about COVID-19 in the Seattle area, Washington state and the nation
- Coronavirus daily news updates, April 7: What to know today about COVID-19 in the Seattle area, Washington state and the nation
- New UW analysis lowers coronavirus death projections and suggests hospitalizations may have already peaked in Washington
- Washington state nonprofit files lawsuit saying Fox News misled viewers about coronavirus
- 'We're all scared': Spread of coronavirus marked by friction, frustration among employees at Valley Medical Center facilities VIEW
The suit names Pierce County Recycling, Composting and Disposal, which does business as LRI, and its owner, Waste Connections of Washington.
A message left with LRI’s office was not returned, and Waste Connections could not be reached for comment.
The LRI website says the landfill has liners and a leak-detection system, among other features, to “meet and exceed all regulatory requirements.”
As for the waterway: “The footprint was configured to avoid impacts to South Creek and its eastern tributary,” the company’s website says.
According to the lawsuit: A combination of test results reported by the facility for its permits and tests done by the Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department showed the landfill’s discharge had higher than acceptable levels of copper, zinc, PCBs, lead, arsenic and other chemicals last year.
Some of the pollution Puget Soundkeeper Alliance alleges, such as landfill leachate, isn’t allowed to be discharged at all.
“It’s basically like garbage juice,” Kinn said. “It’s the fluid that builds up at the landfill over time. It’s as nasty as you would picture it.”
The LRI website describes in detail a process for collecting that liquid, treating it and pumping it into the county sewer system.
But the lawsuit alleges some still ends up in the creek.
Kinn said that while stormwater appears to be the primary way the pollution is getting from the landfill to the creek, there might be other paths that are not yet clear.
It’s also not clear how many days the landfill has been in violation, she said, which would be a factor in determining the potential penalty.
“It’s over a period of years,” Kinn said. “Many, many days, but I really can’t say how many.”
The suit asks the court to order the landfill to pay up to $52,414 for each day it’s been in violation, per the Clean Water Act.
The lawsuit also contends the landfill has been in violation “each and every day during the last five years on which there was 0.1 inch or more of precipitation” and that it continues to be so.