These chemicals have been found in five Washington state drinking-water systems, prompting state health officials to launch broader testing to help document the scope of the contamination.
Two firefighting foam chemicals — when they find their way into drinking water — pose health risks at much lower levels than the current safety guidelines established by the Environmental Protection Agency, according to a draft federal study released Wednesday.
These chemicals are called per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances or PFAS. They have been found in five Washington drinking-water systems at levels above the EPA guidelines, as well as dozens of private drinking- water wells near firefighting training areas where the foams were used.
The new study by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry will be reviewed by the state Department of Health, which is preparing to test several hundred other drinking-water systems in Washington to help assess the scope of the problem. The state also is considering whether to set its own standards for PFAS contamination in drinking water.
The study establishes “minimal risk levels,” which is the amount a person can be safely exposed to on a daily basis, and intended to assist federal and state officials in setting regulatory standards.
Most Read Local Stories
- After decades of neglect, old seminary at Saint Edward State Park reopens as $57M hotel
- COVID-19 death toll is more than double the official count, UW analysis suggests
- Coronavirus daily news updates, May 6: What to know today about COVID-19 in the Seattle area, Washington state and the world
- Five months and $100,000 later, Seattle City Council asks: Where are the street sinks?
- Public records requests mishandled after Seattle mayor's texts went missing, whistleblower investigation finds
For one of these chemicals, the minimal risk level is seven times lower than the current EPA guideline of 70 parts per trillion. For a second one, the level is 10 times lower, according to a review of the study by the environmental working group.
The study also sets minimum risk levels for two other PFAS chemicals that EPA has yet to establish guidelines for but that have both been found in drinking water.
“I think the study underscores the urgency for the state to take action on these chemicals. The state needs to test water systems to ensure that residents aren’t drinking unsafe levels, clean up contamination and get rid of the sources of the contamination,” said Ivy Sager-Rosenthal, communications director for Toxic-Free Future, which led a coalition of groups that petitioned the Department of Health to develop drinking-water standards for PFAS chemicals.
Much of the contamination has been linked to firefighting foam used on military bases, including Naval Air Station Whidbey Island and Fairchild Air Force Base in Eastern Washington.
The Defense Department has paid for alternate sources of water and other assistance when the contamination levels reach or exceed the EPA 70 parts per trillion guidelines. If the study prompts regulators to recommend a lower threshold, this could increase the number of water systems and private wells that would need assistance from the military.
The PFAS chemicals began to be produced in the mid-20th century. In addition to firefighting foams, they are found in many products such as carpets and food wrappers, and now are present in the blood of 98 percent of the U.S. population.
The federal review has been of concern to Trump administration officials.
An unidentified White House aide, in a January email released under the federal Freedom of Information Act to the Union of Concerned Scientists, warned that the study could be a “potential public-relations nightmare.” And there was bipartisan concern in Congress that the administration might try to delay or alter the findings.
In a statement released last month to The Seattle Times, a spokesperson for the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry said the document went through a “normal review process.”