The judge ruled that Oregon Department of State Lands did not overstep when it blocked the proposal for the Coyote Island Terminal project at the Port of Morrow because of potential impacts on tribal fishing.
PORTLAND — An administrative law judge in Oregon on Friday found that state regulators acted within their authority when they rejected a proposed coal terminal on the Columbia River that would funnel millions of tons of American coal to power-hungry Asia each year.
The Oregon Department of State Lands did not overstep when they blocked the proposal for the Coyote Island Terminal project at the Port of Morrow because of potential impacts on tribal fishing grounds, Administrative Law Judge Alison Greene Webster said. The ruling is a blow for Montana and Wyoming, both of which had appealed the 2014 decision on grounds that state laws protecting the environment do not take precedence over federal commerce protections enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.
“This is a huge, huge decision,” said Brett VandenHeuvel, executive director of Columbia Riverkeeper, said of Friday’s action. “If you look back at some of their statements previously, these have been their No. 1 talking points.”
The ruling does not end the case, however. Next up is a November hearing on appeals related to environmental questions about the impacts on state water resources, including potential damage to fishing grounds guaranteed to Northwest tribes by treaty.
Most Read Local Stories
- Notice a bunny boom? Here are some reasons for the Seattle area's recent rise in rabbits VIEW
- Cruise ship turns back to Seattle after power outage
- Man dies in Lake Washington while paddleboarding, police say
- SDOT data shows nearly 100 serious-injury or fatal collisions on Seattle streets in first half of 2019
- Seattle summer weather is back to normal. Here's your forecast for the week.
The Port of Morrow and Coyote Island Terminal LLC also have appealed and the Umatilla, Warm Springs, Yakama and Nez Perce tribes have all intervened.
Wyoming Attorney General Peter K. Michael didn’t immediately return a call for comment late Friday.
Portland attorney James Mountain Jr., who represents Montana in the case, did not immediately return a request for comment.
The project was proposed by the Australian company Ambre Energy and is part of a plan to transport coal mined from the Powder River Basin in Montana and Wyoming through Oregon on its way to Asian markets. The Brisbane-based company proposed bringing the coal by train to Boardman, Ore., where it would be loaded on barges at the Port of Morrow and then sent down the Columbia River to the Port of St. Helens, where it would be transferred to oceangoing ships.
The project was expected to generate several hundred jobs during construction at the Port of Morrow and add about 30 port workers permanently.
Ambre said it would pay $850,000 in annual fees to each of the two ports while paying property taxes in Morrow and Columbia counties.