Oregon LNG had proposed a terminal in northwest Oregon and an 87-mile pipeline linking to a natural gas connector in Washington state. The company wanted to export natural gas from Canada and the Rocky Mountains to Asian markets.
WARRENTON, Ore. — An energy company that wanted to export liquefied natural gas from the northwest Oregon coast will withdraw from the $6 billion terminal and pipeline project, Warrenton officials said.
Mayor Mark Kujala told The Daily Astorian that Oregon LNG officials told him the project was being scrapped because backers were no longer willing to put up the money.
“That is exactly what I heard from Oregon LNG,” Kujala said. “They would be withdrawing the project.”
A phone message left for company officials by The Associated Press on Friday afternoon was not immediately returned.
Most Read Local Stories
- WA launches website to order free COVID tests; here's how to get them
- 'Hey, boys, you've got to keep it down': In Ballard, noisy sea lions are a real scene
- Toxic PCBs festered at a Monroe school for eight years as students, teachers grew sicker
- Washington state at-home coronavirus tests out of stock shortly after website launch
- Missing Trump? Democrats seem lost without him, while the local GOP surges back from the dead
Kristin Grainger, a spokeswoman for Gov. Kate Brown, said the company had withdrawn state permits.
“Public input is critical to the process, and from the outset, the project struggled to build sufficient community support,” she said.
Oregon LNG had proposed a terminal in northwest Oregon and an 87-mile pipeline linking to a natural-gas connector in Washington state. The company wanted to export natural gas from Canada and the Rocky Mountains to Asian markets.
Skip Urling, Warrenton’s community development director, said he was told Oregon LNG would not proceed with an appeal of a city hearings officer’s decision to deny the terminal. A hearing on the company’s appeal was scheduled for early May.
Oregon LNG had said the project would be an economic boon. A draft federal environmental review had estimated terminal construction over four years would generate more than 9,500 jobs. Oregon LNG would have eventually employed about 145 workers.
But a coalition of residents, environmentalists and fishermen blasted the project, calling it misguided and potentially dangerous. Brett VandenHeuvel, executive director of Columbia Riverkeepers, one of the groups opposed to the project, said, “This is a huge victory.”
U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said in a statement that opponents had raised valid concerns. “I shared the concerns that the Oregon LNG project would have had negative environmental and economic impacts, and I am relieved that local voices prevailed,” he said.