New money and the McCleary ruling have completely changed how teachers are paid, promising long bargaining sessions this summer.
When the Legislature added almost $1 billion to the pot for school-employee salaries, it made life easier in some respects for school districts, and harder in others.
They all but guaranteed long bargaining sessions this summer, whether a district’s contracts with its teachers and other employee unions is due to expire or not. The whole system for paying school staff changed.
West Valley School District Superintendent Gene Sementi likens it to putting together an NFL roster with minimum starting pay for players and an overall salary cap, and some room for negotiations within those boundaries.
“It’s kind of like the Seahawks. You have to make decisions about where you spend your money,” said Sementi, whose district has contracts expiring at the end of August. “The whole thing’s kind of up in the air.”
Most Read Local Stories
- ‘What a mess’: Texts by Seattle mayor, council member shed light on head-tax repeal | Times Watchdog
- Talk about a ‘superload’! Check out what just crawled along Washington highways WATCH
- $46 million complex funded by Paul Allen will house 94 families in South Seattle
- Permanent closure of Alaskan Way Viaduct delayed
- Seattle could push UW to slash car commutes, build staff housing as part of high-rise growth plan
The McCleary fix, as it was called based on the state Supreme Court ruling that mandated more state support of schools, did away with the model system almost all districts have used for decades as the basis for their salaries.
While the amount of money coming in from the state is going up, the amount most districts can raise and spend through their own levies is going down, and what they can spend that money on was limited.
The Washington Education Association is telling members it’s time to negotiate big raises. In a video sent to members, the statewide organization urges them to fight for a 15 percent raise for teachers and a 37 percent raise for support staff.
But the state organization doesn’t negotiate contracts, district units do. Local labor leaders said they’re still analyzing what the changes in state and local funding mean for their districts.
Like most labor negotiations, management is trying to tamp down expectations while the unions are trying to bolster them.
“It puts out a good explanation about how much money there is to be bargained,” Katy Henry, president of the Spokane Education Association, said of the WEA video.
The union is still analyzing numbers and has not yet settled on a figure for what it will request for teachers and the other staff it represents, Henry said. But union officials “feel it’s really clear” that the nearly $1 billion the Legislature added to the budget is for salaries, she said.
Some district administrators are worrying that the call for 15 percent and 37 percent are setting unrealistic expectations.
“It’s not nearly as much money as people are being led to believe,” said Wayne Leonard, assistant superintendent for business services for the Mead School District, which will be negotiating a full contract this summer.
Although the district isn’t sure yet how much money it will be getting under the new state formulas, it knows it will have about $11 million less from its property-tax collections.
After following the multiyear legislative saga of efforts to comply with a court mandate to adequately pay for education, the public might best remember a key figure from the 2018 session: $1 billion for salaries. Although that number is correct with rounding — the actual number is $959 million — there are other aspects of legislative action that come into play.
The Legislature set a new pay scale for starting teachers at slightly over $40,000 — with adjustments upward for inflation and some regions in the state — and a cap of $90,000 per year that can also be adjusted.
While adding state money, the Legislature limited a district’s ability to supplement the paychecks of teachers and other school employees out of the money from local levies.
Under the court mandate, the state must pay for “basic education.” A district can use its levy money only for activities that are not basic education, which could include tutoring, mentoring, giving up a planning period to take a class or overseeing extracurricular activities.
“One of the big discussions is going to be what is an enhancement beyond basic education,” Mead’s Leonard said.
“We want to continue to pay well,” Leonard said. “We also want to continue to be financially prudent” and not create a salary schedule that can’t be maintained in later years.
Toby Doolittle, president of the Mead Education Association, agreed that discussions over enhancements, or what’s called enrichment in the law, will be a key part of negotiations. The union, however, may take a broader view of what that covers.
“There are many things that educators do on a daily basis that far exceed the basics of the job,” Doolittle said.
This year’s salary talks won’t be the end of complicated contract discussions for local unions and school districts. Starting in January 2020, school employees will be covered by a new statewide benefit package, including health-care coverage, with different costs and requirements than many districts currently offer.
A new state board is still developing that benefit package, which is expected to be the subject of a new round of talks next year.