The Seattle Police Department’s target response time for priority-one calls is seven minutes, but they consistently miss that in certain parts of town, and for certain types of reports citywide.

Share story

If you called 911 after overhearing your neighbors’ harrowing late-night fight, how long would 18 minutes feel as you waited for the cops to arrive?

A Ballard resident might be able to tell you, because that’s the average response time for a priority-one domestic-violence assault call in that neighborhood.

The target time, citywide, for all priority-one calls — reports of the most urgent situations — is less than seven minutes.

The problem is that the Seattle Police Department (SPD) is consistently missing that target, not only for specific areas of the city, such as Ballard and much of Northwest Seattle, but also for certain types of calls — domestic violence among them.

I found these trends by analyzing five years’ worth of priority-one 911 call data, from 2010 through 2014 — more than 180,000 such calls.

According to SPD public-information officer Sean Whitcomb, “All of our 911 response is by design intended to be equity based, which means regardless of where you live in the city or time of day … everyone is waiting around the same amount of time.”

But for whatever reasons, that is not what’s happening on the ground.

Some parts of Seattle get consistently fast service. In the Pike/Pine section of Capitol Hill, and the adjoining area near Seattle University, the response time to priority-one calls averaged well under five minutes. That’s the fastest in the city.

At the other end of the spectrum is the North Beach/Blue Ridge section of Northwest Seattle, at just shy of 14 minutes, nearly three times longer.

In fact, in 14 of Seattle’s 51 police beats, it took officers more than seven minutes to arrive on the scene for most priority-one calls. These beats cover most of Northwest Seattle, Georgetown, Magnolia and parts of Queen Anne and West Seattle. (The boundaries of Seattle’s 51 police beats were redrawn in early 2015.)

Which was news to Whitcomb. “I’m more than a little surprised at that variance,” he told me.

In a later interview, SPD chief operating officer Brian Maxey explained, “North is known for a lot of geographic chokepoints, with the I-5 corridor cutting it east-west. Some of those bottlenecks, like going down 45th into Ballard, can slow down response times depending on traffic and what the geography is.”

To be fair, most of the time, the department meets its goal for priority-one 911 calls. Citywide, for three out of five calls, officers are at the scene within seven minutes. But that might be small consolation if your call is among the more than 7,800 — 4 percent of all calls — that took longer than half an hour.

And that broaches a separate concern: Even though all priority-one 911 calls have the same target-response time of seven minutes, the actual times vary considerably by crime.

An in-progress robbery and burglary, a fistfight and reports of gunshots are examples of calls where help arrives well within the seven-minute goal, on average. An officer in need of help is the quickest — less than two minutes.

But if you call for a domestic-violence assault, the average citywide wait time is more than 10 minutes. The response to an in-progress violation of a restraining order is even slower — more than 15 minutes.

Maxey told me, “DV [domestic violence] calls are volatile in nature and often very dangerous … If you tell me that DV assault in progress are receiving a slow response time, that’s of critical concern to me. If it turns out that there’s a few minutes’ fluctuation when the aggressor has left and is no longer present, and there’s no longer reason to believe that they’re an active, imminent threat, and it’s more of a follow-up and caretaking situation, that could explain it — again, I hesitate to speculate.”

However, in 2013, Rob Montague, then the SPD’s community-outreach coordinator for the 911 Center, said that domestic-violence-related calls are categorized as priority one even if it’s been one hour since the assault occurred because “Those tend to have a higher chance of going bad very quickly.”

Whitcomb told me all such reports are treated equally — “a priority-one call is a priority-one call” — but added, “There are some calls where some officers would be typically predisposed to drop whatever they are doing to go deal with it. Man with a gun walks into a business, points his gun at the clerk and walks out … We drop everything and go to that. Because what’s the worst thing that could happen? The greater the unknown, the more urgency.”

According to Maxey, a priority-one situation can evolve after the call is dispatched: “Sometimes there’s additional information — sometimes a competing priority-one call might come in that requires a level of triage … these response times are very nuanced to figure out what’s driving them, and digging deeper into the narrative is how we’ve been able to look at this.”

With that in mind, Maxey said the SPD reviews selected calls with exceptionally long response times.

But time-to-scene problems aren’t the only ones the SPD has had with the 911 system. An independent review, completed in May, found that among other issues callers were getting busy signals, which Whitcomb told KIRO-TV was “really unacceptable.”

In response to the report, the SPD is currently undertaking various remedies; among the recommendations in the report are increased staffing inside the 911 call center, additional lines for the 911 network, and improvements to the CAD (Computer-Aided Dispatch) system.

A new high-tech Real Time Crime Center, which opened in October, provides instant analysis of 911 data and trends, and is intended to help officers respond to calls more efficiently.