30 years after banning the controversial breeds, the Yakima City Council is considering repealing the law.
YAKIMA (AP) — Friends and foes of the oft-maligned pit bull terrier may soon have a final answer on whether the dogs can live within Yakima city limits.
More than 30 years after the dogs were banned by city ordinance, the Yakima City Council again will consider allowing them.
That’s almost entirely the result of new requirements approved by the council in June that pit-bull advocates say eliminate the need for the ban.
The new requirements include spaying or neutering a dog that’s been impounded more than once in 12 months, expanding the definition of a potentially dangerous dog to include those that chase someone in a “menacing fashion or apparent attitude of attack,” and increasing the cost to register a dog that has not been spayed or neutered.
Most Read Local Stories
- Washington State Patrol detective violated woman's rights with ruse, hidden cameras, court rules
- Uber and Lyft drop data fight with Seattle, and start another over Sea-Tac Airport data
- Hate crimes skyrocket across the nation, almost double in Seattle over the past year
- Fire at Gascoigne Lumber on North Queen Anne was arson, Seattle fire officials say
- Washington state voters approved new gun regulations in I-1639. Here's what the law will do.
After passing the changes, the council agreed to send the decades-old ban on pit bull terriers to the Public Safety Committee for review. On July 17, before the committee could provide its recommendation, the council unanimously voted to have city staff create an ordinance repealing the ban in its entirety.
The changes aren’t enough for ban supporters, who say the breed is inherently dangerous and cite many instances to prove their point. For example, in 2014, a pit bull escaped from a home in Yakima, attacked another dog and bit three people who tried to separate the dogs.
Three separate attacks by pit bulls prompted the ban’s creation in 1987. The ban defines the breed as “any American pit bull terrier, Staffordshire bull terrier, American bulldog or American Staffordshire terrier breed.”
A vote to repeal the ban is expected at Monday’s council meeting, and is likely to be the last time this council votes on it.
Councilwoman Carmen Mendez, who’s raised the issue several times since taking office in 2016, said she won’t bring it up again after this vote, no matter the outcome.
She said she’s confident the issue will be resolved through litigation.
The city is facing a lawsuit over what the plaintiff calls an inappropriate seizure of a service dog named Romeo. The dog was taken, according to the lawsuit, because a city animal control officer determined it possessed the “characteristics of a pit bull.”
Mendez has said previously that the lawsuit and issues with the pit bull ban are tied. But she did not say what parts of the ban the city believes are a problem.
The meeting begins at 6 p.m. Monday at City Hall, 129 N. Second St. The meeting time was changed to allow council and community members to participate in National Night Out, which is scheduled for Tuesday.