An attorney for the man's family called on Snohomish County authorities to re-examine the fatal shooting of Jeremy Dowell. Though Lynnwood paid the settlement, the officer who shot Dowell had been found to have acted reasonably.
The city of Lynnwood has paid $1.75 million to settle a lawsuit in which a dozen witnesses questioned the actions of a Lynnwood police officer who fatally shot a knife-wielding man on Highway 99 last year, an attorney for the man’s family said Wednesday.
The federal lawsuit, brought in May on behalf of the parents of 36-year-old Jeremy Dowell, a man with mental-health issues who was shot multiple times, accused Officer Zachary Yates of “outrageous and reprehensible use of deadly force” during a midmorning confrontation on Jan. 30, 2017.
Seattle attorney Ed Budge, who filed the suit along with his partner, Erik Heipt, called the payment one of the largest in Washington state involving excessive-force allegations against police, particularly in a case resolved without going to trial.
He said the settlement will be divided among Dowell’s mother, Suzette Dowell, his stepfather, Robert Dowell, and Jeremy Dowell’s estate.
Most Read Local Stories
- Map: Kim Schrier won big in King County suburbs, even in Dino Rossi's neighborhood
- Bike-share company Lime launching car-rental service in Seattle
- Hate crimes skyrocket across the nation, almost double in Seattle over the past year
- Seattle Public Schools makes progress but doesn't meet most improvement goals in latest scorecard
- Senate approves exemption for Anacortes-built trawler grounded by too much foreign steel
As part of the settlement, the city made no admission of wrongdoing on the part of the officer, Budge said.
Lynnwood officials couldn’t be reached for comment Wednesday.
Although the suit named only Yates as a defendant, the city’s insurance risk pool paid the settlement sum as part of its legal obligation to defend him, Budge said.
The suit also alleged that the Snohomish County Multiple Agency Response Team, which is known as SMART, and carries out independent investigations of the use of deadly force by police in the county, conducted a biased inquiry that found Yates acted reasonably.
In contrast, 12 witnesses who provided sworn declarations to Budge challenged the official version in stark and sharply critical language. While no one disputed that Dowell was carrying a knife, six people who said they saw the initial confrontation said Dowell never directly threatened Yates.
Ten of the witnesses said Yates continued to fire shots at a helpless, stumbling or severely injured Dowell. Five said some rounds were fired while Dowell was on the ground and half the witnesses described the shooting as a slaying.
Some of the witnesses also complained that they weren’t contacted by detectives after giving statements at the scene.
Warning: Graphic content
The suit alleged Yates quickly jumped out of his patrol vehicle, pursued Dowell on foot and almost immediately began shooting him.
He said the shooting should be re-examined by the prosecutors, Lynnwood police and the SMART team.
Based on SMART’s findings, Snohomish County prosecutors declined to bring criminal charges against Yates.
Prosecuting Attorney Mark Roe began a review of the investigation in May after being shown the declarations but has yet to reach a conclusion.
“I recognized ISIS to be a terrorist group that is known for creating terror and specifically attacking innocent civilians in unconventional ways and in particular to commit ‘Lone Wolf’ attacks,” Yates later wrote in a statement.
Yates said he saw Dowell bolt across Highway 99 toward a Costco parking lot, where he witnessed Dowell reach into a backpack.
Yates, in his statement, said he stopped his car and began chasing Dowell, coming within a few feet of him before deciding to end the chase when he saw Dowell was carrying a “large fixed blade knife.”
But as he stopped, Yates said, Dowell abruptly turned toward him, forcing Yates to backpedal.
In light of the earlier disturbance call and the reference to ISIS, Yates said, he felt he and the public were in danger because of Dowell’s irrational behavior.
Yates said he recalled ordering Dowell to drop the knife, along with other officers.
When Dowell ignored the orders, Yates said he fired once, thinking Dowell would fall. However, the officer said Dowell continued to move toward him after being shot two more times, Yates wrote.
Yates said he feared Dowell was moving toward another officer, Hubby, before Dowell dropped to the ground and attempted to get back up and come toward him again.
“I remember feeling a sense of panic as I knew I had fired several rounds and the rounds that I fired did not appear to have the intended effect of stopping him,” Yates wrote.
Dowell fell to his “knees/feet” but continued to ignore commands to drop the knife, Yates said, adding he feared Dowell would become mobile again.
“I fired several more rounds center mass” that knocked Dowell to the ground, wrote Yates, who fired 10 shots overall.
Witnesses who later provided the declarations raised questions at the scene.
Rachel Hodson, 22, wrote in a written statement that day that she heard two shots, then saw a police officer pointing a gun at a man.
“The officer then shot the man two more times,” Hodson wrote. “He was stumbling around and then he was on the ground. The officer shot him several more times after he was on the ground. I do not feel … it was necessary for a man to die today.”
In her declaration in the lawsuit, Hodson said, “Based on my firsthand observations, I believe the officer murdered the young man that morning.”
She said she gave investigators contact information but didn’t hear from them.
In their summary, SMART investigators wrote that witness statements were “consistent with the statements” of the involved officers, physical evidence and the “totality of the investigation process.”
Robert and Suzette Dowell issued a statement Wednesday. “This unjustified shooting of our son has left a hole in our hearts that will never heal,” they said, adding, “Jeremy suffered from mental illness, but he did not need to die. Police need to learn to de-escalate instead of using deadly force as their first option.”