Following the trail of a Supreme Court Justice’s environmental legacy.
LONG BEFORE THE words “ecology” and “environmentalist” became part of our everyday lexicon, early 20th-century conservation pioneers — such as President Teddy Roosevelt and John Muir — advocated to preserve nature. Post-World War II, this movement took on a new urgency as the age of the automobile thrived, and the nation was treated to ubiquitous stretches of asphalt, overcrowded campgrounds and traffic.
Serendipity brought me to this world of Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas and his environmental legacy. As a Wyoming native, I long have been drawn to the mountains — the Tetons and later the Cascades — during my many years of climbing.
One winter, while snowshoeing in Grand Teton National Park, I came across an unfamiliar homestead and discovered it was the Murie Center, “Conservation’s Home.” I asked, “You mean, like John Muir?” No, the director explained: Olaus and Mardy Murie, celebrated conservationists. Once I read their stories and journals, I was hooked, especially when I happened on personal correspondence between the Muries and Douglas. What could be the connection between these unlikely friends?
Most Read Stories
- The five priciest Seattle-area homes last year sold for a combined $113M. Four went to mystery buyers. VIEW
- Special sunglasses, license-plate dresses: How to be anonymous in the age of surveillance WATCH
- Snohomish County elementary school teacher found dead from hypothermia
- New software flaw could further delay Boeing’s 737 MAX
- At gun-rights rally, Washington state Rep. Matt Shea gives fiery defense, talks of nation's 'real enemies' VIEW
My quest for an answer has taken me from Wyoming to Washington, D.C. — to the Douglas archives at the Library of Congress, The Wilderness Society and Murie papers at the Murie Archives, the American Heritage Center at the University of Wyoming, the Western History Center in Denver, the Sierra Club archives at Berkeley’s Bancroft Library and the University of Washington library.
I discovered the fascinating intersection of Douglas’ Supreme Court opinions; his public and private quest to save the wilderness; and his friendship with conservation leaders, like the Muries, Howard Zahniser and David Brower. Although the notion of women and conservation did not fit together naturally at that time, women too are some of the heroes of this story.
Douglas, an enigmatic figure, left his mark on American jurisprudence and on American’s landscape. His legacy as a citizen justice is a story worth telling.