"He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it.”
Had an assassin’s bullet not taken his life on a sunny morning in Memphis, Tennessee, on April 4, 1968, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. might have lived to celebrate his 90th birthday last week. Can you imagine how the world might be different had he been granted a long life?
Each year, during the celebration of his all-too-brief 39 years on this earth, many of us take a moment to resurrect him through his words, seeking to understand him a bit more, and to move beyond his “I Have A Dream” speech to know the full measure of the man. Although that speech is among the most powerful and frequently cited in the history of American speech making, it has, as Michael Eric Dyson asserts, “frozen” King in our collective consciences as a safe, one-dimensional figure, and not the radical critic of American society that he actually was.
In one of his earliest efforts to hold up a mirror to society and compel it to action, King wrote the book, “Stride Toward Freedom.” In it, King recounted the developments of the Montgomery Bus Boycott of 1955-56, seeking to counter the skewed perspectives of newspaper reporters and commentators, offering instead a more fact-based retelling of the events of that historic time. Among the most poignant and resonant passages in that book, King wrote:
Do you have something to say?Share your opinion by sending a Letter to the Editor. Email email@example.com and please include your full name, address and telephone number for verification only. Letters are limited to 200 words.
“He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it.”
Most Read Opinion Stories
- Portland, you lost me with your culture-wars chaos | Op-Ed
- The Times recommends: Ann Davison Sattler for Seattle City Council, District 5 | Editorial
- Run, Jay, run — and get out of our way | Horsey cartoon
- The Times recommends: Vote 'yes' for King County parks | Editorial
- America’s toxic ‘both-sideism’ | Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist
At the time he wrote those words, King was responding to the critiques of white clergymen who viewed the nascent civil rights movement King led as moving too fast, demanding too much and becoming too turbulent for the times. But King also sought to reach past their ill-formed and biased objections to their congregations and to American society in general, challenging its silence and inactivity. King recognized that the legalized and longstanding oppression that he and his black followers were subjected to was depraved and was appealing to the broader society’s moral code and passiveness.
His words rang out from Montgomery, moving people to action throughout America and the world and forging a civil rights movement that would eventually change American society. History has proved King right, and all who draw breath today are the beneficiaries of his wisdom and fortitude, as well as the courage and sacrifice made by his followers almost 65 years ago.
The complicity of those who remain silent in the face of evil is a theme that he would frequently return to, and one that speaks powerfully to us in 2019. The daily drumbeat of insults to our morality that we read about in this paper or watch on our screens has paralyzed too many of us into inaction and silence. Day after day, the fabric of our neighborhoods and our country is frayed a little bit more, and too few of us march in protest, or volunteer with a nonprofit, or vote in an election.
Dr. King might say to us that our self-centeredness and inaction, our silence in the face of today’s evils, is a modern-day version of the cooperation that he warned against back in 1957. Rather than remaining silent at the outrages of our times, or mindlessly reciting “I Have a Dream,” I hope that we will recommit to opposing evil, to protesting it, and never cooperating with it.