The editorial “Reefer madness in the halls of the DEA” [Opinion, Aug. 14] perfectly explains the cognitive dissonance in the DEA’s insistence on continuing to classify marijuana as a Schedule I drug, while (minimally) easing restrictions on growing marijuana for research purposes.
Another example is the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s patent issued in 2003 for “Cannabinoids as Antioxidants and Neuroprotectants,” citing the efficacy of cannabinoids in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. Is the DEA cognizant of this fact?
Here in Washington state, we have a serious, sometimes fatal problem with heroin and opioid addiction. Yet, as The Times stated in the editorial, opioids remain Schedule II drugs, allowing for research and prescription access. But marijuana, which has never been documented to cause overdose fatalities, remains Schedule I.
Research into marijuana efficacy and safety is extremely important. As a state senator, my legislation (enacted in 2015) created a cannabis research license, permitting researchers working with the University of Washington and Washington State University to grow marijuana for research purposes. However, without reclassification of marijuana, the program cannot be fully viable.
Most Read Opinion Stories
- Seattle's persistent crime problem demands change | Editorial
- Why Jews don't see Easter the way Christians do
- David Horsey on the safety of Seattle streets | Opinion
- Seattle's long-neglected Aurora Avenue North is ripe for change | Op-Ed
- Bernie Sanders and the myth of the 1 Percent | Paul Krugman
We need to move forward with current and developing science and not be restricted by the DEA’s misguided, outdated and harmful policies.
Jeanne Kohl-Welles, Seattle