Regarding “State death penalty struck down” and the Washington Supreme Court ruling the death penalty as inherently discriminatory and therefore unconstitutional: It’s probably the right result.
And yet I find myself thinking about the family member of victims who was quoted in the article. That was the husband/father whose wife and kids were murdered. He is looking for a way to deal with his rage, and I can’t blame him a bit for supporting the death penalty. Rightly or wrongly, I agree with the man.
The governor, King County prosecutor and Supreme Court justices say the death penalty is an archaic, barbaric punishment. Perhaps so. We undoubtedly want our appellate courts to strike race-based punishments, whether it be for a misdemeanor traffic violation or the death penalty.
I’m glad we have a court so attuned to the racially based applications of capital punishment. But maybe striking it on a case-by-case basis would have been the better approach. That would have preserved a means for the victims’ families to have a say, and kept capital punishment for the fewest of instances when we as a society see it as warranted.
Most Read Opinion Stories
- Paul Allen's lasting contributions | Editorial
- The Rich White Civil War
- The editorial board recommends: Yes on I-940 to change law on police use of deadly force
- The Times recommends: Vote no on misleading I-1634, the effort to ban local soda taxes | Editorial
- Immigration rule change would force people to choose between food and family | Op-Ed
David Voyles, Seattle