The Supreme Court of the United States should uphold President Obama’s 2014 deferred action orders, especially since Congress refuses to fix the nation's broken immigration system.
THE national debate over immigration reform keeps moving further from reason and now borders on the absurd.
The best hope for a course correction is the U.S. Supreme Court.
On April 18, the justices will hear oral arguments in a lawsuit filed by 26 states seeking to overturn President Obama’s 2014 executive orders deferring deportations of certain immigrants — parents of lawful citizens and people brought to the U.S. before the age of 16. The court should uphold Obama’s pragmatic decision. He acted after years of interminable congressional stalling. Immigration advocates had nicknamed him “deporter-in-chief” because of his administration’s record number of deportations compared to his predecessors.
Now the national conversation is poisoned by the reckless rhetoric of Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump, who boasts of mass deportation and making Mexico pay for a wall along the U.S. border.
Most Read Opinion Stories
- After gut punch from genealogical research, reparations | Op-Ed
- Shellfish farming, the lifeblood of Pacific County, faces extinction | Op-Ed
- We need salmon in Alaska and the Pacific Northwest, and they need our protection | Op-Ed
- Our long national nightmare is just beginning | Max Boot / Syndicated columnist
- Greater Seattle punches below its weight in philanthropy | Op-Ed
About 11 million people are in the United States illegally, living and working throughout the country. They fit every profile, from farmworkers to college graduates to tech entrepreneurs.
Congress should enact comprehensive immigration reform that offers non-criminals a path toward citizenship. Two years ago, Washington’s U.S. Sens. Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell helped pass a bipartisan bill to do just that. That effort stalled when the House leadership refused to schedule a vote.
In a bit of theater last week, Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, R-Wis., introduced a resolution to submit an amicus brief from the full chamber to the Supreme Court opposing the president’s deferred-action order. It passed the House 234-186, a split vote that should not be construed as speaking for the whole chamber.
Washington’s 10-member congressional delegation split along party lines Thursday, with Republican U.S. Reps. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, Jaime Herrera Beutler, Dan Newhouse and Dave Reichert siding with their party leaders.
Fine. They got their partisan resolution.
They should also demand a vote for real immigration reform.