[caption id=”attachment_25181″ align=”aligncenter” width=”620″] Substitute teacher Carrie Richardson, who has more than 50 years experience teaching, subs in for a third-grade teacher at Emerson Elementary School in Seattle last November. Photo by Ken Lambert / The Seattle Times 2014.[/caption]
A bill introduced in the state House on Tuesday would temporarily allow some retired teachers more flexibility in how much they can work without losing their retirement benefits.
House Bill 1737 is a response to the substitute teacher shortage in Washington state, which has left schools and districts scrambling to fill substitute requests and combining classes when subs can’t be found. Lawmakers behind the bill say the shortage is partly caused by a state pension plan that keeps some retired teachers — a group that school districts traditionally rely on for subs — from substitute teaching.
Under the bill, teachers who retired early under a certain retirement plan would be allowed to substitute teach up to 216 hours — or about 27 days — before losing their retirement benefits, at least for a few years.
Most Read Stories
- KNKX takes meteorologist Cliff Mass off the air after he likens Seattle protest actions to 1938 Nazi pogrom
- Coronavirus daily news updates, August 7: What to know today about COVID-19 in the Seattle area, Washington state and the world
- Hot, hot summer for Washington home shoppers: Record-breaking prices and a cutthroat market
- From peanut butter to applesauce, Washington state stockpiles tons of food for the need ahead
- Eleven kids in Washington have been diagnosed with rare coronavirus syndrome
The bill, if passed, is designed to give school districts enough time to adjust to the substitute shortage. If it passes, its provisions would sunset in 2019, and the teachers would go back to losing their pensions any month they worked even a day for a public employer.
The bill applies to about 1,000 Washington teachers who have retired since 2008. Those teachers chose a retirement plan that offers higher pension benefits in exchange for agreeing that they can’t work for any public employer before they turn 65 without losing their pension check for the month. State lawmakers in charge of pension policy discussed the rule at committee meetings in November, after retired teachers and the state teachers union urged them to look into it.
The bill is now before the House Appropriations Committee, and it’s unclear how much the bill might cost the state.