WASHINGTON — The Trump appointee who oversees the government’s global media operations is moving to shut down a federally funded nonprofit that helps support internet access around the world, documents show, a decision that could limit people’s ability to get around constraints in places that tightly control internet access, like Iran and China.

The appointee, Michael Pack, chief executive of the U.S. Agency for Global Media, is seeking to restrict the nonprofit, the Open Technology Fund, from receiving federal funding for three years, in part because of a dispute over whether the fund should support work done by the Falun Gong, the spiritual movement known for spreading anti-China, pro-Trump misinformation.

His action, a month before President-elect Joe Biden takes office, would be difficult for the new administration to undo.

The nonprofit, which is funded by the global media agency, helps develop technology that makes it easier for more than 2 billion people in more than 60 countries to access the internet. It is known for helping create tools like Signal, an encrypted messaging application, and Tor, a web browser that conceals a user’s identity while logged on to the internet.

Officials at the fund have 30 days to appeal Pack’s decision, according to documents. Pack, an ally of Steve Bannon, President Donald Trump’s former adviser and strategist, will oversee any appeal, legal experts said. His final decision must be made by Jan. 19, one day before Biden takes office, the documents show.

Legal experts said that Biden will likely not be able to immediately overturn Pack’s decision, indicating it could be months before all legal questions surrounding Pack’s decision are answered.

Advertising

During that time, the Open Technology Fund would not be able to receive any money from the federal government and will only have enough funds to keep its staff of 10 employed until June, officials at the nonprofit said.

Without funding, projects that help provide nearly 1 in 4 Iranian citizens and 10 million people in China access to the internet could be at risk of stopping, the officials added.

“This is the kill shot,” Laura Cunningham, acting chief executive officer of the Open Technology Fund, said in a statement to The New York Times. “Without OTF, users around the world will be cut off from the global internet.”

A spokesperson for the U.S. Agency for Global Media said that the agency is committed to funding a range of firewall circumvention technologies.

Pack has cited multiple reasons for moving to strip the Open Technology Fund of federal funding.

He said that the organization lacked “adequate authorization from Congress” to be a government-funded nonprofit, according to documents. The fund started in 2012 as a pilot program within Radio Free Asia, a broadcasting outlet under the agency’s purview. In 2019, Congress allowed it to become an independent nonprofit grantee of the media agency.

Advertising

Pack said that the Open Technology Fund has breached conflict of interest rules by not disclosing if it has paid its board of directors. He has also said that the funds his agency has given the nonprofit group have had “no apparent impact” on internet freedom.

Tools supported by the Open Technology Fund are recommended by organizations including the United Nations.

“Mr. Pack’s allegations against OTF are baseless and utterly absurd,” Cunningham said. “The preposterous, easily disprovable nature of Mr. Pack’s allegations make it clear that his actions are purely punitive and without substantive merit or cause.”

The Open Technology Fund has received bipartisan support in Congress. In a September Congressional oversight hearing for the U.S. Agency of Global Media — where Pack ignored a subpoena to testify — lawmakers said that the fund’s budget of $20 million dollars has proved invaluable in stemming the advance of Chinese and Russian surveillance technology, protecting human rights activists and journalists in repressive societies across the world, while allowing millions to access the internet across the globe.

In a joint statement Saturday, Sen. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee and Rep. Michael McCaul of Texas, both Republicans, said Pack’s attempts to strip the Open Technology Fund of access to U.S. government funding for the next three years, called debarment, would be a significant setback to U.S. foreign policy objectives.

The effort “is a blow to democracy movements around the world who rely on their services to push back on authoritarian regimes,” they said. “This latest attempt by CEO Pack to circumvent Congress and gut the Open Technology Fund, which is a lifeline for freedom fighters around the world, is absolutely unacceptable and will endanger democracy movements, and lives, across the globe.”

Advertising

The Open Technology Fund became the target of Pack shortly after he took office. He moved to fire the fund’s board in June. That decision was challenged in the federal courts. A federal judge has temporarily overturned Pack’s decision until a final ruling is issued.

In June, Pack temporarily withheld millions in funding to the nonprofit. In response, 527 human rights organizations and internet freedom groups — including Human Rights Watch and the Wikimedia Foundation, which hosts Wikipedia.com — called on members of Congress to protect the nonprofit group from Pack’s actions.

Much of the worry around the Open Technology Fund revolves around its leadership’s resistance toward funding a piece of firewall circumvention software called Ultrasurf, developed by a member of Falun Gong, the secretive, spiritual movement persecuted by the Chinese Communist Party. The group has embraced Trump for his anti-China stances.

Michael Horowitz, a Reagan administration budget official and longtime supporter of Ultrasurf, went on Bannon’s show in June denouncing Libby Liu, the Open Technology Fund’s founder, saying she should be fired. Liu — who was dismissed by Pack in June — is not a proponent of funding Ultrasurf, a current official at the Open Technology Fund said.

The State Department in July issued an audit of Ultrasurf, saying the “Ultrasurf platform, in its current state, would be a costly and ineffective waste of U.S. taxpayer dollars.” In November, Pack provided Ultrareach Internet Corp., the parent company of Ultrasurf, a nearly $1.8 million contract, federal data shows.