Two top officials with Hungary’s National Meteorological Service (NMS) were fired Monday after severe storms they had forecast in the Hungarian capital on the country’s most important national holiday did not materialize as expected, instead passing to the south.

The forecast called for intense storms in Budapest around 9 p.m. local time, according to reporting from the Associated Press, a forecast that led organizers to postpone a massive annual fireworks display. The fireworks show that celebrated St. Stephen’s Day, a Hungarian holiday that honors the country’s founding, is usually watched by more than a million people.

After the errant forecast, Hungarian media criticized the agency. The NMS issued a statement on its Facebook page apologizing the next day, but it was too late to save the jobs of the agency’s chief, Kornelia Radics, and her deputy, Gyula Horvath.

On Tuesday morning, 17 agency leaders again posted a statement on the meteorological service’s Facebook page to demand that their fired colleagues be reinstated as soon as possible, arguing that the firings were politically motivated and that the forecast was issued based on the best possible information at the time.

“It is our firm view that, despite considerable pressure from decision-makers, our colleagues . . . provided the best of their knowledge and are not responsible for any alleged or actual damage,” the statement reads.

Bob Ryan, former president of the American Meteorological Society, told The Washington Post that the firing sends a “chilling message” to professional scientists.

Advertising

“I think it’s outrageous and now makes every forecaster working in Hungary frightened they may lose their job because of a wrong forecast,” Ryan said.

Matt Lanza, who runs Houston’s Space City Weather, said that the inherent complexities of weather make a completely accurate forecast nearly impossible.

“Like anyone, a meteorologist should be held accountable for their performance at work,” Lanza said. “But unless they carried out their duties in a negligent or insubordinate manner, it would be unjustifiable to fire a forecaster based on that single forecast.”

This is hardly the first time that scientists have faced pressure from their government.

During the “Sharpiegate” controversy, when President Donald Trump displayed a doctored forecast for 2019’s Hurricane Dorian, several officials at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) feared that they might be fired for standing by their policy on scientific integrity.

Trump had erroneously tweeted that Alabama could be in the path of the system, a decision he and members of his Cabinet stood by despite forecasts from NOAA showing little to no impact in that state from the storm.

Advertising

This month, the firing of a top Brazilian environmental official caught global attention. Samuel Vieira de Souza, director of the Brazilian environmental agency IBAMA, was fired in what the Associated Press reported was a possible act of political retribution after sitting down for an interview with a Brazilian television station to discuss illegal gold mining in the Amazon.

Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro has pushed for opening up more of the Amazon to legal economic activity, and some have criticized his policies in the Amazon, which have worsened deforestation – Brazil’s top source of greenhouse gas emissions.

In another incident, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un once appeared to become angry at members of his country’s meteorological service, scolding them a month after a severe drought hit the country in 2014.

“It is necessary to fundamentally improve the work of the Hydro-meteorological Service to scientifically clarify meteorological and climatic conditions and provide accurate data for weather forecast and meteorological and climatic information required by various fields of national economy in good time,” Kim reportedly said.

In another instance, six Italian seismologists were jailed and convicted of manslaughter in 2012 years after a lengthy legal battle following their failure to predict a 6.3-magnitude earthquake in 2009 that killed 308 people. Their sentences were later overturned, and the seismologists were cleared of wrongdoing.

The trial stunned many in the scientific community, as earthquakes are difficult if not impossible to predict – though some say progress has been made. Scientists have been able to develop programs that can give limited forewarning of earthquakes, including California’s ShakeAlert system.