A Saudi judge has asked several hospitals in the country whether they could damage a man's spinal cord as punishment after he was ...
CAIRO — A Saudi judge has asked several hospitals in the country whether they could damage a man’s spinal cord as punishment after he was convicted of attacking another man with a cleaver and paralyzing him, the brother of the victim said Thursday.
Abdul-Aziz al-Mutairi, 22, was left paralyzed and subsequently lost a foot after a fight more than two years ago. He asked a judge in northwestern Tabuk province to impose an equivalent punishment on his attacker under Islamic law, his brother Khaled al-Mutairi said in a telephone interview.
He said officials at one hospital, in Tabuk, responded that it is possible to damage the spinal cord but added that it would have to be done at another more specialized facility. Saudi newspapers reported that a second hospital in the capital, Riyadh, declined, saying it could not inflict such harm.
Administrative offices of two of the hospitals and the court in Tabuk were closed for the Saudi weekend beginning Thursday and could not be reached for comment.
Most Read Nation & World Stories
- Officer charged with George Floyd's death as protests flare VIEW
- Officer accused in Floyd's death opened fire on 2 people VIEW
- White House and CDC remove coronavirus warnings about choirs in guidance for reopening houses of worship
- Quartet of marvels: Texas mom has quadruplets without fertility treatments, and they are identical
- Will you go back to the gym when coronavirus shutdown ends? Here's what you need to consider
A copy of the medical report from the King Khaled Hospital in Tabuk province said the same injury al-Mutairi has can be inflicted on his attacker using a nerve stimulant to induce the same injuries in the same locations. The report was dated six months ago.
Saudi Arabia enforces strict Islamic law and occasionally doles out punishments based on the ancient legal code of an eye for an eye. However, King Abdullah has been trying to clamp down on extremist ideology.
The query by the court, among the most unusual and extreme to have been made public in the kingdom, highlights the delicate attempt in Saudi Arabia to balance a push to modernize the country with interpretations of religious traditions that critics say are out of sync with a modern society.
Saudi newspaper Okaz identified the judge as Saoud bin Suleiman al-Youssef.
The brother said the judge asked at least two hospitals for an opinion on whether surgeons could render the attacker’s spinal cord nonfunctional. He and Saudi newspaper reports did not identify the attacker
Khaled al-Mutairi, 27, said the assailant was sentenced to 14 months in prison for the attack that paralyzed his younger brother, but he was released after seven months in an amnesty. He said the attacker then got a job as a schoolteacher.
“We are asking for our legal right under Islamic law,” the brother said. “There is no better word than God’s word: an eye for an eye.”
Okaz reported that a leading hospital in Riyadh — King Faisal Specialist Hospital — said it could not do the operation, apparently refusing on ethical grounds.
Islamic law applied in Saudi Arabia allows defendants to ask for a similar punishment for harms inflicted on them. Cutting off the hands of thieves, for example, is common.
Under the law, the victim can receive a blood-money payment to settle the case.
Khaled al-Mutairi said his family is not interested in blood money and would be ready to send the attacker abroad to perform the operation if it were not possible in the kingdom.
Human-rights group say trials in Saudi Arabia fall far below international standards. They usually take place behind closed doors and without adequate legal representation.
Those who are sentenced to death are often not informed of the progress of legal proceedings against them or of the date of execution until the morning of the day they are beheaded.
Crucifying the headless body in a public place is a way to set an example, according to the kingdom’s interpretation of Islam.
Amnesty International expressed concerns over the reports and said the rights group was contacting Saudi authorities for details.
“We are very concerned and we will appeal to the authorities not to carry out such a punishment,” said Lamri Chirouf, the group’s researcher on Saudi Arabia.
According to Amnesty, in 2005, a dentist pulled out the teeth of a convict in the kingdom because he had smashed another man’s teeth out in a fight.
“We have also had cases of people sentenced to blindness because they have caused the blindness of another person,” Chirouf said. “But never anything involving a spinal cord.”
Associated Press reporter Sarah El Deeb contributed from Cairo.