PHOENIX (AP) — An Arizona Court of Appeals ruling says an Arizona law providing for stiffer sentences for use of a dangerous instrument in an attack only applies to cases in which the victim is a human, not an animal.
The ruling Thursday agreed with a trial judge that the alleged beating of a dog with a metal rod doesn’t qualify as a “dangerous offense” that could resulting in longer prison sentence if there’s a conviction.
According to the ruling, the sentencing enhancement’s wording indicates the Legislature intended to enhance punishment for dangerous offenses to protect human life and that means the law applies when a person attacks another person.
The ruling decided an appeal filed in a Maricopa County case of a man awaiting trial.
Most Read Nation & World Stories
- Sports on TV & radio: Local listings for Seattle games and events
- Key Largo is so flooded that crocodiles are swimming in the streets
- Trump escalates attacks on McConnell with 'DEATH WISH' post
- Russia withdraws troops after Ukraine encircles key city
- Daylight saving ends soon. Wait, didn't lawmakers vote to end this?