Internet service providers funded an effort that yielded millions of fake comments supporting the Federal Communications Commission’s repeal of so-called net neutrality rules in 2017, the New York attorney general said Thursday.
Internet providers, working through a group called Broadband for America, spent $4.2 million on the project, Attorney General Letitia James said. The effort generated roughly 9 million comments to the agency and letters to Congress backing the rollback, almost all signed by people who had never agreed to the use of their names on such comments, according to the investigation. Some of the names had been obtained earlier in other marketing efforts, officials said. The agency approved the repeal in late 2017.
Broadband for America’s members include some of America’s most prominent internet providers, like AT&T, Comcast and Charter, as well as several trade groups.
Supporters of the repeal regularly cited the number of comments opposing the rules. Investigators said Broadband for America had “commissioned and publicized a third-party study” of how many comments were being submitted, and then briefed FCC officials on their findings as part of their push.
“Instead of actually looking for real responses from the American people, marketing companies are luring vulnerable individuals to their websites with freebies, co-opting their identities and fabricating responses that giant corporations are then using to influence the policies and laws that govern our lives,” James said in a statement.
The report said investigators had not found evidence that Broadband for America or the lobbying firm it used for the campaign were aware of the fraud. But, the attorney general said, several “significant red flags” appeared “shortly after the campaign started and continued for months, yet still remained unheeded.”
The attorney general’s office said it had reached agreements with three “lead generation” services that were involved: Fluent, Opt-Intelligence and React2Media, companies that gather customers for clients as part of marketing efforts. Under the agreements, the companies said they would more clearly disclose to individuals how their personal information was being used. The companies also agreed to pay more than $4 million in penalties.
In a statement, Fluent said the matter had been resolved “in a way that provides clarity and sets a new standard in the political advocacy space.” It noted that many of the changes in the agreement “were already adopted years ago.”
Broadband for America, AT&T, Charter and Comcast did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The report offers a window into how some broadband providers and their representatives in Washington tried to shape the debate over the net neutrality rules, which forbade them to block content, slow it down or make people pay more to deliver it faster.
Ajit Pai, then the chair of the FCC, announced a plan to repeal the rules in April 2017. Around the same time, Broadband for America started to pay providers of lead generation services millions of dollars to generate comments at the FCC and letters to Congress supporting the repeal.
Investigators said Broadband for America had acted to give Pai “cover” to repeal the broadband regulations. The internet providers have staunchly opposed attempts to regulate the industry for years, including by pushing for Congress to approve weaker rules instead.
In total, about 18 million of the 22 million comments sent to the FCC during the debate over the net neutrality rules were fake, the investigation found. More than 9 million fake comments were filed at the FCC supporting the rules, arguing that repealing them would leave consumers paying more for a slower internet, according to investigators. A 19-year-old computer science student was responsible for more than 7.7 million of them.
The activist group Fight for the Future and several news outlets raised early concerns about the possibility that some of the comments were fake after individuals whose names appeared on messages to the FCC said they had not signed on to them.
“The public record should be a place for honest dialogue, but today’s report demonstrates how the record informing the FCC’s net neutrality repeal was flooded with fraud,” Jessica Rosenworcel, the agency’s acting chair, said in a statement. “This was troubling at the time because even then the widespread problems with the record were apparent.”