Apollo, a private equity firm, and Citigroup made large loans last year to the family real-estate business of Jared Kushner, President Trump’s senior adviser. There is little precedent for a top White House official meeting with executives of companies as they contemplate sizable loans to his business, say government ethics experts.

Share story

Early last year, a private-equity billionaire started paying regular visits to the White House.

Joshua Harris, a founder of Apollo Global Management, was advising Trump administration officials on infrastructure policy. During that period, he met on multiple occasions with Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, said three people familiar with the meetings. Among other things, the two men discussed a possible White House job for Harris.

The job never materialized, but in November, Apollo lent $184 million to Kushner’s family real-estate firm, Kushner Companies. The loan was to refinance the mortgage on a Chicago skyscraper.

Big deal, even for a big lender

Even by the standards of Apollo, one of the world’s largest private-equity firms, the previously unreported transaction with the Kushners was a big deal: It was triple the size of the average property loan made by Apollo’s real-estate lending arm, securities filings show.

It was one of the largest loans Kushner Companies received last year. An even larger loan came from Citigroup, which lent the firm and one of its partners $325 million to help finance a group of office buildings in Brooklyn.

That loan was made in the spring of 2017, shortly after Kushner met in the White House with Citigroup’s chief executive, Michael L. Corbat, according to people briefed on the meeting. The two men talked about financial and trade policy and did not discuss Kushner’s family business, one person said.

There is little precedent for a top White House official meeting with executives of companies as they contemplate sizable loans to his business, say government ethics experts.

“This is exactly why senior government officials, for as long back as I have any experience, don’t maintain any active outside business interests,” said Don Fox, the former acting director of the Office of Government Ethics during the Obama administration and, before that, a lawyer for the Air Force and Navy during Republican and Democratic administrations. “The appearance of conflicts of interest is simply too great.”

The White House referred questions to Kushner’s lawyer, Abbe Lowell, who did not dispute that the meetings between Kushner and the executives took place.

Peter Mirijanian, a spokesman for Lowell, said in a statement that Kushner “has taken no part of any business, loans or projects with or for” Kushner Companies since joining the White House and that he has followed ethics advice.

 Dogged by questions on conflicts of interest

Christine Taylor, a spokeswoman for Kushner Companies, said Kushner’s White House role had not affected the company’s relationships with financial institutions.

An Apollo spokesman, Charles Zehren, said Harris was not involved in the decision to loan money to Kushner Companies. He said the loan “went through the firm’s standard approval process.”

A Citigroup spokeswoman, Danielle Romero-Apsilos, said Kushner Companies had been a bank client since before the election and that the relationship had no connection to Kushner’s White House role. She said Citigroup negotiated the 2017 loan with Kushner Companies’ business partner, a real-estate developer.

Kushner’s tenure in the White House has been dogged by questions about conflicts of interest between his government work and his family business, in which he remains heavily invested. Kushner steers American policy in the Middle East, for example, but his family company continues to do deals with Israeli investors.

Kushner recently lost his top-secret security clearance amid worries from some U.S. officials that foreign governments might try to gain influence with the White House by doing business with Kushner.

Investigators working for Robert Mueller, the special counsel looking into Russian interference in the 2016 election, have asked questions about Kushner’s interactions with potential investors from overseas, according to a person familiar with the matter. Kushner’s firm has sought investments from the Chinese insurer Anbang and from the former prime minister of Qatar.

Mirijanian, the spokesman for Kushner’s lawyer, said that Mueller had not sought from the Kushner Companies or Kushner “any information or document concerning any business dealing either has had.”

Kushner resigned as chief executive of Kushner Companies when he joined the White House last January, and he sold a small portion of his stake in the company to a trust controlled by his mother.

But he retained the vast majority of his interest in Kushner Companies. His real- estate holdings and other investments are worth as much as $761 million, according to government ethics filings.

Refinancing Chicago skyscraper

Public filings show that Kushner still owns part of the company that received the Apollo loan.

The loan was used to refinance a Chicago skyscraper that is the Midwest headquarters for AT&T.

Kushner also still holds a stake in the entity that owns the Brooklyn buildings and received the loan from Citigroup.

Kushner has also met at the White House with Stephen Schwarzman, chief executive of the private equity firm Blackstone, which in the past has lent money to Kushner Companies for several projects, though all before the election. Until August, Schwarzman was the head of a White House business-advisory council.

“Blackstone has not done any business with Kushner Companies since the election, nor has Steve ever discussed private business matters with Mr. Kushner,” said a Blackstone spokeswoman.

Apollo has sought ways to benefit from the White House’s possible infrastructure plan. And its executives, including Harris, had tens of millions of dollars personally at stake in the tax overhaul that was making its way through Washington, D.C., last year.

Citigroup, one of the country’s largest banks, is heavily regulated by federal agencies and, like other financial companies, is trying to get the government to relax its oversight of the industry.

Kushner has reported owning hundreds of partnerships, limited liability companies and other entities, but he is not required to disclose the lifeblood of any real-estate firm’s business: its lenders and outside investors.

Apollo, best known for investing in companies such as Caesars Entertainment and Norwegian Cruise Lines, was founded by Harris, Marc Rowan and its current chief executive, Leon Black.

Black and Kushner sat next to each other at the 2016 U.S. Open, a few months before the presidential election.

Harris, a co-owner of the Philadelphia 76ers and the New Jersey Devils, is Apollo’s senior managing director. He also is an adviser to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Early last year, the White House enlisted Harris and other executives to advise the administration on infrastructure policy. Over a period of months, Harris met regularly with Kushner and other White House officials.

Apollo made the loan to Kushner Companies on Nov. 1, 2017, according to public records.

Benefits from tax-cut package

Apollo does not make real-estate loans directly. Instead, it makes them through a so-called real estate investment trust, called Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance.

One of the largest investors in Apollo’s real-estate trust is the Qatari government’s investment fund, the Qatar Investment Authority.

Kushner’s firm previously sought a $500 million investment from the former head of that Qatari fund for its headquarters at 666 Fifth Avenue in Manhattan. That investment never materialized.

Shortly after Kushner Companies received the loan from Apollo, the private-equity firm emerged as a beneficiary of the tax-cut package that the White House championed.

Trump backed down from his earlier pledge to close a loophole that permits private equity managers to pay taxes on the bulk of their income at rates that are roughly half of ordinary income tax rates. The tax law left the loophole largely intact.