The Islamic State group’s reclusive leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, has empowered his inner circle with wide-ranging authority in case he is killed.

Share story

WASHINGTON — The Islamic State group’s reclusive leader has empowered his inner circle of deputies and regional commanders in Syria and Iraq with wide-ranging authority, a plan to ensure that if he or other top figures are killed, the organization will quickly adapt and continue fighting, U.S. and Iraqi intelligence officials say.

The officials say the leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, delegates authority to his Cabinet, or shura council, which includes ministers of war, finance, religious affairs and others.

The Islamic State’s leadership under al-Baghdadi has drawn mainly from two pools: veterans of al-Qaida in Iraq who survived the insurgency against U.S. forces with battle-tested extremist skills, and former Baathist officers under Saddam Hussein with expertise in organization, intelligence and internal security. It is the merger of these two skill sets that has made the organization such a potent force, the officials say.

But equally important to the group’s flexibility has been the power given to Islamic State group military commanders, who receive general operating guidelines but have significant autonomy to run their own operations in Iraq and Syria, according to U.S. and Kurdish officials.

This means that fighters have limited information about the inner workings of the Islamic State group to give up if captured, and that local commanders can be killed and replaced without disrupting the wider organization. Within this hierarchy, Iraqis still hold the top positions, while Tunisians and Saudis hold many religious posts.

Much of a new understanding about the leadership of the Islamic State group, also known as ISIS, has come from information about the organization’s financial operations, recruiting methods and security measures found in materials seized during a U.S. commando raid in May in eastern Syria. U.S. officials said gathering more insight on the Islamic State group’s shadowy leadership structure was a top priority.

In delegating authority, al-Baghdadi has drawn lessons from the fates of other groups, including that of a branch in Yemen called al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula, whose leaders have been whittled away by repeated U.S. drone strikes over the years, said a Western diplomat who monitors the group.

ISIS “has formed a structure that can survive the losses of leaders by giving midlevel commanders a degree of autonomy,” the diplomat said. In that structure, the overall operation would not be immediately affected if al-Baghdadi were wounded or killed, he said.

Studied Snowden

The Islamic State group has also studied revelations from Edward Snowden, the former National Security Agency contractor, about how the United States gathers information on extremists. A main result is that group’s top leaders now use couriers or encrypted channels that Western analysts cannot crack to communicate, intelligence and military officials said.

The two top leaders after al-Baghdadi appear to be Abu Alaa al-Afri, a former top deputy to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the former extremist leader in Iraq; and Fadel al-Hayali, known as Abu Muslim al-Turkmani, a former Iraqi Special Forces officer from the town of Tal Afar, near Mosul, although there have been unconfirmed Iraqi reports that both men were killed in airstrikes in recent months. It is unclear who would replace al-Baghdadi as the self-declared caliph if he died, a Kurdish official said. But the official said it could not be al-Afri, assuming he is alive, because he is an ethnic Turkmen, and the caliph must be an Arab from the Quraysh tribe of the Prophet Muhammad, as al-Baghdadi claims to be.

The United States is actively hunting al-Baghdadi — rumors that he was killed or injured this year have been dispelled. Defense Secretary Ash Carter said this month that if the opportunity for an strike against al-Baghdadi presented itself, “we would certainly take it.”

Despite the trove of information uncovered in May, U.S. intelligence and counterterrorism officials say there are still large gaps in what they know about how the Islamic State’s leadership operates and how it interacts with a growing number of affiliates and other followers from Nigeria to Afghanistan.

The Islamic State group’s strict secrecy, which has allowed its leadership to remain so mysterious, has led to some differences among U.S. and other Western analysts on the degree to which al-Baghdadi is in charge and whether the main power in the organization rests with his allies, including several of the former Baathist officers.

Information control

The Islamic State maintains tight control over the flow of information about it, with a list of rules about what its fighters may and may not mention, analysts said. As such, much of the information made public has come from the group itself and conveys the image that it wishes to project.

Kurdish commanders fighting the Islamic State group on the ground say that certain groups of foreign fighters appear to move like shock troops around territory controlled by the group.

Before a major Islamic State offensive on the city of Kirkuk early this year, the Kurds began getting reports that a Russian commander had come there with his own group of fighters, said Polad Talabani, head of the counterterrorism unit of the Kurdistan regional government.

To fuel its war effort, the Islamic State group relies heavily on explosives and has set up factories to provide them to fighters. Improvised explosive devices, or IEDs, defused by Talabani’s men were welded metal squares the size of briefcases, with sturdy handles to make them easy to carry and distribute.

Another commander displayed cellphone fuses used to remotely detonate bombs. On each one was a sticker with instructions printed in Arabic on how to use it, including which ringtone to choose.

“Do not use Korek SIM cards,” the instructions read, using the name of a Kurdish-owned wireless company. The warning appears to be a response to the possibility that Kurdish officials could shut down the cell towers during a battle so the Islamic State group could not detonate its bombs.

A senior military official with the U.S.-led coalition against the Islamic State also said the group’s tight security made it hard to know who exactly is killed in airstrikes.

“We are not there to follow up,” the military official said. “We are not there to check on damage that is caused by strikes, and so we have to make our best assessment by viewing the footage.”

When asked if the Islamic State group was run from the top down or if local commanders did their own thing, he said, “I’m not sure if we have clarity on that either way.”