In a disinformation age, Macedonian and Western officials say the flurry of social-media activity is just that — disinformation directed by Russia-backed groups trying to stoke fears and depress turnout in a vote that could put this Balkan nation on a path to join NATO.
SKOPJE, Macedonia — As Macedonians prepare for the most important vote in their nation’s history, scores of Facebook posts are urging voters to burn their ballots. Hundreds of new websites are calling for a boycott. And one news article, widely shared online, warns that Google may eliminate Macedonian from its list of recognized languages, depending on the vote.
In a disinformation age, Macedonian and Western officials say the flurry of social- media activity is just that — disinformation directed by Russian-backed groups trying to stoke fears and depress turnout in a vote that could put this Balkan nation on a path to join NATO.
And the West is trying to fight back, albeit unevenly: A congressional effort to confront Russian disinformation has been hamstrung by divisions in Washington. To fill the void, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis will travel to Skopje, the country’s capital, on Monday to show U.S. support. Jens Stoltenberg, the NATO general secretary, has already visited, as have Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany and Federica Mogherini, the European Union’s foreign-policy chief.
All have a simple message: It’s now or never.
Most Read Nation & World Stories
- Fuller picture emerges of viral video encounter between Native American and Catholic students
- The man who stood behind Trump VIEW
- 2-for-1: Total lunar eclipse comes with supermoon bonus VIEW
- Democrats reject, conservatives deride Trump's 'non-starter' of a border wall deal
- 'Sister Wives' family makes home in inclusive Arizona city
“There is no going back from this,” said Prime Minister Zoran Zaev of Macedonia. “Each attempt to hinder these processes takes the Republic of Macedonia back to a state of complete uncertainty about its future, a society in which the authoritarian values and instability could be reintroduced.”
A young and fragile democracy that was once part of Yugoslavia, Macedonia is the latest Balkan country to find itself a theater in the long-running geopolitical contest between Russia and the West. The referendum, scheduled for Sept. 30, asks Macedonian voters whether to end a three-decade dispute with Greece by renaming their country North Macedonia. Approval could unblock Greek objections to bringing its neighbor into the Western fold.
Russian officials have broadly denied that they are trying to affect the outcome of European elections. But Russian diplomats have made no secret of their opposition to further NATO expansion, arguing that it would destabilize the Balkans.
Russia has a murky recent history in the region: The United States and NATO have accused Moscow of trying to orchestrate a coup in nearby Montenegro in 2016, in an effort to topple a pro-Western government and to derail possible NATO membership.
“One of Russia’s top foreign-policy and security goals is to oppose NATO at every step,” said James Mackey, who leads the Euro-Atlantic and global partnership office at NATO.
Congress allocated money in January 2017 to fight Russian disinformation campaigns, including $8 million specifically for Macedonia. But the money did not arrive for more than a year, and it has yet to be effectively deployed, according to a Western official who agreed to speak about the subject only on the condition of anonymity. An additional $2 million, meant to promote the rule of law in Macedonia, which is still struggling with endemic corruption, had not arrived as of August, the official said.
NATO officials say they provided information to help Macedonia counter the Russian campaign. “We see Russia is trying to meddle, to spread disinformation,” Stoltenberg said. He added that opinion polls continued to show majority support for the country’s name change, despite the Russian campaign.
When he arrives in Skopje on Monday, Mattis will emphasize the $5 million in annual security support the United States provides, Eric Pahon, a Pentagon spokesman, said.
“Russia seeks to convince the Macedonians that the West is going to abandon them, that Russia is the stable influence in the region,” Pahon said. “That is just not true.”
Changing Macedonia’s name and bringing the country into the alliance, Pahon said, would reduce Moscow’s influence. “Macedonian accession to NATO is one of Russia’s worst nightmares,” he added.
In Macedonia, officials blame Russia-backed online groups for proliferating false articles and Facebook posts as a way to heighten social divisions, drive down participation and amplify public anger. This spring, football hooligans opposed to the name change clashed with police officers outside Parliament in Skopje — an episode quickly seized on by people who produced false stories claiming government brutality.
“There is a famous Balkan singer, and they took an old picture of her beaten and bruised in a domestic-violence incident, and tried to claim she was beaten by police at the protest,” said Marko Troshanovski, who works for Societas Civilis, a research institute focused on promoting democracy.
After the clash, Zaev, the prime minister, blamed Moscow and expelled a Russian diplomat. In response, Oleg Shcherbak, the Russian ambassador to Macedonia, offered a stark warning.
“If it came to a conflict between Russia and NATO,” he warned ominously, “you will have the role of a legitimate target.”
According to Western officials, Moscow’s primary goal is to depress turnout. If less than half of registered voters participate in the referendum, the issue is forced back to Parliament, undermining the popular mandate for a solution.
In Macedonia and Greece, the name issue taps deeply into issues of national identity and pride. Greeks believe that since ancient Macedonia was a Hellenistic culture, Slavic-speaking Macedonians cannot claim it. For those living in Macedonia, it is equally simple: For as long as they have lived in these lands, they have called themselves Macedonians and no outsider has a right to tell them what they can call themselves.
Western diplomats say that 40 new websites are popping up each day on Facebook to encourage people to boycott the referendum. These websites, originating outside the country, fit a pattern of Russian interference in other elections, diplomats say.
In a country largely divided along ethnic lines, some websites deliberately stoke tensions with the country’s ethnic Albanian minority, evoking memories of a yearlong armed conflict in 2001 between the government and a faction of Albanians.
“Are you going to let Albanians change your name?” is a common theme.
Macedonia was on the cusp of NATO membership in 2008, but Greece blocked it. This month’s referendum comes after Zaev and Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras, of Greece, reached an agreement in June that cleared the way to end the long standoff.
Assuming Macedonian voters agree to the name change, and Macedonia’s Constitution is amended to reflect it, the deal then would be subject to approval by the Greek Parliament. Greek officials also have accused Moscow of interference and have responded by expelling two diplomats.
“They are spending money in Greece, trying to add to the resistance to the Macedonia name issue,” said Ben Hodges, a former U.S. Army commander in Europe, who is now at the Center for European Policy Analysis.
Meanwhile, Mattis’ visit Monday is meant to signal U.S. resolve — even as some Republicans in Washington are increasingly resistant to expanding NATO. Montenegro’s membership was opposed by Republican Sens. Rand Paul and Mike Lee, and conservative publications have produced articles in recent weeks questioning the wisdom of further NATO expansion, specifically citing the case of Macedonia.
President Donald Trump recently described Montenegro as a “tiny country” with “very aggressive people,” raising doubts about whether the United States would come to its defense.
“They may get aggressive, and, congratulations, you’re in World War III,” he said.
Officials in Skopje nervously took note of Trump’s comments but said that they believed the United States stood firmly behind their bid to join NATO.