WASHINGTON — If you support Democratic Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick’s bid for re-election, stay away from AnnKirkpatrick.com. The site might greet visitors with a welcoming photo of the Arizona congresswoman and a screaming “Kirkpatrick for Congress” logo, but that design belies its true agenda.
Funded and created by the Republican Party’s congressional campaign wing, the site’s true aim is in the fine print: to defeat Kirkpatrick, described as “a huge embarrassment to Arizona.”
The National Republican Congressional Campaign (NRCC) bought up hundreds of URLs ahead of the 2014 election cycle and has created nearly 20 websites that seem to support Democratic candidates in all but the small print, a spokesman for the campaign confirmed last week.
The NRCC rolled out the first such site in August, targeting Sean Eldridge, who is facing a tough race in New York’s 19th District. Since then, the organization has created mock campaign sites for 17 other candidates, including House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Alex Sink, a candidate for Florida’s 13th District.
Most Read Nation & World Stories
- Saudi student opens fire at Florida Naval base, killing 3 VIEW
- Emotional support animals on planes: New rules are coming
- Trump complains low-flow toilets are flush with problems
- Twitter explodes after Melania Trump rebukes Stanford professor for comment about Barron
- Trump on likely impeachment: 'Do it now, fast'
One Sink supporter was so confused while visiting the NRCC’s mock website that he mistakenly donated to the Republican committee instead of giving to the Sink campaign, the Tampa Bay Times reported. The NRCC said it would refund anyone who donated mistakenly.
A spokesman for Rep. Krysten Sinema, D-Ariz., one of the candidates targeted by the NRCC campaign, said it’s important to draw a distinction between satire and deception.
“I’ve certainly seen a lot of parody campaigns — websites and Twitter accounts — and I think that satire is a part of our culture,” the spokesman said. “But just actually trying to make people think you are somebody you are not I think is underhanded.”
Since the websites surfaced, the NRCC’s Democratic counterpart has cast the websites as deceptive and a sign of weakness.
“Republicans in Congress have gotten so desperate and afraid defending their special-interest agenda,” that they are now trying to “trick people into supporting them and trying to disown their own toxic, out-of-touch brand,” said Josh Schwerin, a Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesman.
NRCC spokesman Daniel Scarpinato defended the strategy, calling the Democratic candidates’ official websites “deceptive” for omitting support for President Obama’s policies. He also dismissed concerns the sites were misleading, characterizing the language contained in the websites as “clearly negative.”
Although Scarpinato said the websites do not violate Federal Election Commission (FEC) rules, at least one campaign-law expert disagrees. Paul Ryan, a senior counsel at the Campaign Legal Center, said the sites violate an FEC regulation created in the ’90s. The rule prohibits noncandidate committees, such as the NRCC, from using a candidate’s name in headlines, titles and letterheads unless the use demonstrates clear opposition to the candidate.
“These websites are on the opposite end of the spectrum,” Ryan said. “A name preceding the term ‘for Congress’ is textbook pro-candidate advocacy.”
Scarpinato said the NRCC will continue generating the fake websites, adding that the organization owns “hundreds of URLs that the Democrats chose not to purchase.”