More than three years after the Sept. 11 attacks, the Bush administration has failed to create a unified U.S. fingerprint database because of agency infighting, meaning most visitors...
WASHINGTON — More than three years after the Sept. 11 attacks, the Bush administration has failed to create a unified U.S. fingerprint database because of agency infighting, meaning most visitors to the country still aren’t screened fully for terrorist or criminal ties, the Justice Department’s watchdog warned yesterday.
The continued bureaucratic clashing — the very behavior the Bush administration pledged to end after the attacks — is causing serious delays in solving the problem. In his fourth report about the situation, Inspector General Glenn Fine said the situation “creates a risk that a terrorist could enter the country undetected.”
Despite some improvement, the Justice, State and Homeland Security departments are at an impasse over such basic issues as whether two or 10 fingers should be printed at U.S. borders and which law-enforcement agencies should have access to immigration information.
Most Read Stories
- Seattle’s income tax on the wealthy is illegal, judge rules
- Analysis: Five reasons the Seahawks waived Dwight Freeney WATCH
- 2 shot at Capitol Hill nightclub in Seattle
- 'I just can’t take these night games': Husky football fans tired of late games, with little notice
- Before losing cancer battle, Ben Cushing inspired Cougars, Huskies to band together
“Progress toward the longer-term goal of making all biometric fingerprint systems fully interoperable has stalled,” Fine’s report concluded.
Without an integrated system, the review found that watch lists used to check certain visitors at borders contain a small portion of the 47 million records in FBI fingerprint files — the Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System, or IAFIS — and that these incomplete lists are prone to error.
Current Homeland Security plans call for fingerprint checking against FBI files of fewer than 1 percent of the estimated 118,000 daily U.S. visitors whose prints should be checked, or fewer than 1,180. Yet by the end of 2005, the officials expect to check only about 800 people a day against the FBI database.
Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, a senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said creation of a single system should be “counterterrorism 101.”
“What more will it take for these bureaucracies to realize that integration of these databases is not only necessary but essential to the war on terror?” Grassley said.
Since the 2001 attacks, Congress repeatedly has pushed the agencies to devise a single, quick fingerprint-identification system that could be used by all law-enforcement agencies and immigration and intelligence officials.
The agencies “have different sets of mission objectives, and each one has been a forceful advocate for its respective position,” Justice Department top administrative official Paul Corts said.
One key unresolved question is how many fingers should be printed and how. The Justice Department sides with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, which has recommended taking 10 “flat” fingerprints along with a digital photograph of the individual. These “flat” prints, NIST says, are almost as accurate as the “rolled” fingerprints favored by the FBI and should take only 10 to 15 seconds longer than taking two finger prints.
The Homeland Security and State departments, which now take only two finger prints, disagree. In a letter to Fine, Homeland Security Undersecretary Asa Hutchinson cited “inaccuracies and incorrect assumptions” in the review, including estimated costs, time delays and workload increases of moving to a 10-print system.
The system “is not designed for booking criminals,” Hutchinson said, but is intended as a “lookout” for suspect individuals.
Janice Jacobs, the State Department’s top visa services official, said a test program in Monterrey, Mexico, found that it took up to a minute longer to take 10 prints. “Adding one minute of processing time to 7 million visa applications annually has significant workload implications,” Jacobs wrote to Fine.
Homeland Security officials also have resisted giving the FBI and other law-enforcement agencies access to its visitor records, partly to ensure privacy of those individuals.
In addition, the problem of inaccuracies in various watch lists has occurred repeatedly since Sept. 11, 2001, and some groups have complained loudly that they are singled out unfairly for scrutiny.
Fine made a number of recommendations intended to accelerate progress on the fingerprint system, warning that further delays will increase costs.
On top of that, he warned that the current FBI fingerprint file’s capacity to handle search requests could be taxed severely — meaning more system outages and delays — if all foreign visitors are checked.