After the quake, it took 45 minutes for the tsunami to reach the coast of Japan — 45 minutes of knowing, of waiting, of bracing.
LOS ANGELES — After the quake, it took 45 minutes for the tsunami to reach the coast of Japan — 45 minutes of knowing, of waiting, of bracing.
When it came, they were all glued to their televisions — a Jesuit priest in New York, an engineering professor in rural Oregon, a geophysicist in San Diego. What unfolded never had been broadcast live before: a 13-foot wall of mud that belittled human achievement, folding houses inside out, propelling yachts across miles of rice fields, rupturing oil refineries, sweeping trains from their tracks and killing hundreds.
By now, we’re versed in bearing witness to the aftermath of disaster: limbs jutting from collapsed buildings in Haiti; survivors using laundry to spell out “HELP US” on their rooftops after Hurricane Katrina. This was different — a disaster unfolding in visceral, wrenching real time, for viewers who alternately were spellbound and tortured by their inability to do anything about it.
Japan’s plight came on a sunny Friday afternoon; the magnitude 8.9 earthquake, the largest to strike the area in more than a millennium, hit at 2:46 p.m. local time. Japan is not only an advanced economy but one of the most wired nations on Earth; at one point Friday, there were 20 tweets a second coming out of Tokyo.
Most Read Nation & World Stories
- White House at war with itself even as it fights impeachment inquiry
- U.S. Navy submarine lost with all hands in World War II is found off Okinawa
- Donald Trump Jr. talk marked by anger over no Q&A
- Mini Mercury skips across sun's vast glare in rare transit VIEW
- Split Supreme Court appears ready to allow Trump to end DACA VIEW
The nation, meanwhile, is a voracious consumer of information, and media outlets and government officials had plenty of time after the quake to get their cameras in place — as well as estimates of where the waves would hit and when, which proved quite accurate.
It was a confluence of events and circumstance that helped us watch, or forced us to watch, in a new way. When it was over, the images seemed to have bent both edges of the spectrum of comprehension: Scientists questioned the limits of science. And believers questioned the limits of faith.
Deepak Chopra, the spirituality-and-wellness author, said he was surprised to find his first thoughts as he watched the disaster unfold were of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Japanese cities leveled by American nuclear bombs at the end of World War II. Imagine, he thought, if Americans had watched those bombs explode on live television. “Would we be as tolerant as we are that we and many other countries are stockpiling nuclear weapons?” he asked.
“We are living in a very interesting time,” he said. “What is emerging is that you cannot separate yourself emotionally or in any other way from what is happening anywhere in the world. We are a global community. We need to feel this pain. We need to act upon it. We need to realize that we are now entangled with everything that happens — everywhere.”
Many said the only experience comparable to watching the tsunami was watching the destruction in lower Manhattan on Sept. 11, 2001. Indeed, some of the images on Friday cut close to the bone for Americans — in particular, the disturbing video of victims trapped in tall buildings, waving white shirts out of open windows in a desperate attempt to flag down rescuers, smoke curling around them.
“You are totally powerless against a memory like that,” said J. Jon Bruno, the Episcopal bishop of Los Angeles. “It is embedded into your being.”
Ken Reeves, director of forecasting operations at Accuweather.com, was captivated and horrified watching video of cars trying to steer clear of the debris field, with no high ground in sight. He watched a group of people standing on a bridge as rising, churning water sent boats lurching toward them. He said he couldn’t help but think: “My God, get off the bridge!”
For years now, Americans have reveled in an unlikely and incongruous notion on television: “reality that is unreal,” said Father Jim Martin, a Jesuit priest in New York City and the culture editor of America, the weekly Catholic magazine.
Here was something different: reality that was real, more gripping and terrible than anything even the most creative or cynical television producer could conjure. “It’s the shock of seeing real reality instead of fake reality. It seems paradoxically unreal,” Martin said.
“A lot of these reality shows are based on watching people suffer — watching them suffer physically, watching them suffer financially. It’s important to recognize that we don’t have to create suffering in this world. There is suffering in this world.”
“The hubris of humanity makes us forget how powerful nature can be,” said Bill Patzert, a climatologist at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in La Canada-Flintridge, Calif. He said this was “not an act of God” — but then he paused and added: “Well, I hope not. I could be wrong.”