HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — Connecticut’s highest court on Thursday ordered the state’s death row emptied out, ruling that a 2012 law abolishing capital punishment for any future crimes must be applied to the 11 men facing execution for offenses committed before it took effect.
In a sharply divided 4-3 ruling, the court declared the death penalty violates the state’s constitution, “no longer comports with contemporary standards of decency and no longer serves any legitimate penological purpose.”
Michael Courtney, who heads the capital defense unit for the state’s Office of the Public Defender, said the decision could be “very helpful nationally.”
“The United States Supreme Court may consider these very issues under the federal constitution in the fall,” he said.
Most Read Nation & World Stories
- Trump says he will leave if electoral college votes for Biden
- You should probably replace some of your fabric face masks
- Sports on TV & radio: Local listings for Seattle games and events
- A Trump-boosting sheriff earned White House visits. Now she's charged with theft.
- High court blocks NY virus limits on houses of worship
The Connecticut court’s ruling cited factors that have come up in other states to abolish the death penalty including racial and economic disparities in its use, the costs involved with appeals, the cruelty of the wait for execution and the risk of executing innocent people.
David McGuire, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Connecticut, said the way the judges approached the issue “is going to provide ammunition for abolitionists across the country.”
Opposition to the death penalty has been growing in the United States. Thirty-one states still have capital punishment, but several others have turned against it in recent years, including Nebraska, which voted for abolition in May, and Maryland, which abolished it in 2013. Robert Dunham, executive director of the nonprofit Death Penalty Information Center, noted that the number of death sentences imposed last year marked a 40-year low in the country.
The ruling came in an appeal from Eduardo Santiago, whose attorneys successfully argued that any execution carried out after the 2012 repeal would constitute cruel and unusual punishment. Santiago, whose first death sentence was overturned, faced a second penalty hearing and the possibility of lethal injection for a 2000 murder-for-hire killing in West Hartford.
But the Connecticut ban had been passed prospectively because many lawmakers refused to vote for a bill that would spare the death penalty for Joshua Komisarjevsky and Steven Hayes, who were convicted of killing a mother and her two daughters in a highly publicized 2007 home invasion in Cheshire.
Jennifer Hawke-Petit was raped and strangled. Her daughters, Hayley, 17, and Michaela, 11, died of smoke inhalation after they were doused with gasoline and the house was set on fire. Michaela was sexually assaulted.
Justice Richard Palmer wrote that it would not be permissible to execute other convicts “merely to achieve the politically popular end of killing two especially notorious inmates.”
The ruling drew harsh criticism from the three dissenting justices and legislative Republicans, who accused the court of taking on the role of policymakers.
“In making this determination, the majority disregards the obvious: the legislature, which represents the people of the state and is the best indicator of contemporary societal mores, expressly retained the death penalty for crimes committed before the effective date of (the repeal),” Chief Justice Chase Rogers wrote.
Dr. William Petit, who was beaten but survived the home invasion that killed his wife and daughters, criticized Thursday’s ruling.
“The dissenting justices clearly state how the four members of the majority have disregarded keystones of our government structure such as the separation of powers and the role of judicial precedent to reach the decision they hand down today,” Petit said in a statement. “The death penalty and its application is a highly charged topic with profound emotional impact, particularly on the victims and their loved ones.”
Santiago was sentenced to lethal injection in 2005 for the killing of 45-year-old Joseph Niwinski, who prosecutors say was shot in exchange for a pink-striped snowmobile with a broken clutch in 2000.
But the state Supreme Court overturned the death sentence and ordered a new penalty phase in 2012, saying the trial judge wrongly withheld key evidence from the jury regarding the severe abuse Santiago suffered while growing up.
Santiago’s mother expressed joy Thursday that he no longer had to fear execution.
“It’s a big weight lifted off everyone,” Christina Hagarty said. “Good things come to those who wait.”
The chief state’s attorney’s office declined to comment on the ruling, saying it was reviewing it.
Senior Assistant State’s Attorney Harry Weller had argued that there were no constitutional problems with the new law and that death row inmates simply faced a penalty under the statute that was in effect when they were convicted.
Connecticut has had just one execution since 1960. Serial killer Michael Ross was put to death in 2005 after winning a legal fight to end his appeals.
Democratic Gov. Dannel P. Malloy said those who have been on death row will spend the rest of their lives in state prisons with no possibility of freedom.
“Today is a somber day where our focus should not be on the 11 men sitting on death row but with their victims and those surviving family members,” he said. “My thoughts and prayers are with them during what must be a difficult day.”
Associated Press writers Michael Melia and Dave Collins contributed to this report.
This story has been corrected to delete a reference to 11 men being on death row when the repeal was passed; not all had been sentenced at that time.