The proposal would have expanded the indecent-exposure law to include any nipple exposure, including men’s, and any garment that “gives the appearance or simulates” a person’s buttocks, genitals, pelvic area or female nipple.

Share story

HELENA, Mont. — A Montana legislative panel moved to kill an indecent-exposure bill Wednesday after the lawmaker who introduced it said he thinks yoga pants should be illegal.

Members of the House Judiciary Committee voted unanimously to table House Bill 365, which Rep. David Moore introduced Tuesday.

The proposal would have expanded the indecent-exposure law to include any nipple exposure, including men’s, and any garment that “gives the appearance or simulates” a person’s buttocks, genitals, pelvic area or female nipple.

Although members of the committee giggled about the bill, no discussion was allowed before a voice vote to table it.

Moore, R-Missoula, said tightfitting beige clothing could be considered indecent exposure under his proposal. “Yoga pants should be illegal in public anyway,” he said after the hearing Tuesday.

Moore said that he wouldn’t have a problem with people being arrested for wearing provocative clothing but that he’d trust law-enforcement officials to use their discretion. He couldn’t be sure whether police would act on that provision or if Montana residents would challenge it.

“I don’t have a crystal ball,” Moore said.

Moore and Walt Hill, a retired professor in Missoula, initiated the drafting of HB 365 after the Bare as you Dare bicycle event outraged some residents last summer. Fearing that denying organizers an event permit would breach free speech, city officials allowed participants, many of them nude, to ride through downtown Missoula on Aug. 17.

“I want Montana to be known as a decent state where people can live within the security of laws and protect their children and associates from degrading and indecent practices,” Hill said in support of the measure. “I believe this bill is written preserving that reputation.”

In 1991, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Barnes v. Glen Theatre that state prohibitions on public nudity are constitutional given that nudity in itself is not an expression. Bare as you Dare organizers call the event a celebration of body image and bicyclists’ right to use public roads.

Rep. Virginia Court, D-Billings, said she was concerned that the provision prohibiting garments showing the outline or appearance of a woman’s nipple unfairly targeted women. “I think you are kind of being a little prejudiced against women,” Court said.

A person now convicted of indecent exposure three times could be sentenced to life in jail and up to $10,000. In an effort to promote enforcement of the law, Moore said, the bill would lessen that to not more than five years in jail and $5,000.

A first offense for violating Montana’s indecent-exposure law carries a fine of no more than $500 and six months in jail. A second offense carries up to $1,000 or one year in jail. Those punishments were unchanged in Moore’s bill.