Trying out the newly designated U.S. Bicycle Route 10 across northern Washington, a 416-mile biking trip.

Share story

In a forest of blackened spires, victims of last summer’s largest wildfire in Washington history, I climbed out of the Methow Valley toward Loup Loup Pass on two wheels, breathing heavily and dripping sweat.

A cardboard box on the side of the road stopped me. It was illustrated with a bicycle ascending the steep incline of Loup Loup, flames licking its tires. “Cold Water,” the box read, describing its contents. “Hot Hot.”

In the days previous, I had ridden from the cool marine air of Anacortes into the Skagit Valley. I ascended through the blustery woods of Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest to the cold alpine reaches of the North Cascades Highway, only to blaze down through the warm winds of the Methow Valley.

More information

• For more information on U.S. Bicycle Routes, see

• For details and a day-by-day guide to U.S. Bicyckle Route 10 across Washington state, see

Already, drivers had affably waved and honked at me. Motorcyclists had given me the low-key salutation usually reserved for their own kind. Strangers approached me on the street to inquire about my journey.

But free water on one of the hardest climbs of my trip? That was a first.

I had seen so much of the state, and been shocked at the hospitality along the way, yet I’d only ridden 175 miles of my trek along U.S. Bicycle Route 10. Many more were between me and my destination of Sandpoint, Idaho. These miles are a small percentage of those in the national bike highway network.

Washington state’s U.S. Bicycle Route 10, which follows state Highway 20 most of the way across Washington, accounts for 416 miles in the nationwide network of bike routes, which has nearly 9,000 miles of official routes.

State planners and cycling advocates worked for nearly four years to have the first official Western bike route appear in Washington, and now they say the route will only do more to burnish the state’s standing as the most bike-friendly in the union.

Steering the way

When the idea of a nationwide network of bike highways was hatched in 1978, the Pacific Northwest was not the cycling mecca it is today. In fact, the first two official routes were designated on the other side of the country in 1982.

No other routes appeared until 2011, when the dormant U.S. Bicycle Route system was revived by the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials and Adventure Cycling Association. Since then, the groups have added more than 1,500 miles of bike routes to the system every year.

As I found on my tour, an official bike route doesn’t require much. No bike lane, signs or even a substantial shoulder is needed, though all of these things are very desirable. The only real rules for an official bike route are it must connect two or more states, or a state and an international border, or connect to another official route.

Of course, nothing is that simple. Every jurisdiction along USBR 10 — 18 cities and towns, seven counties and a handful of transportation districts — had to approve the route, along with federal officials.

“We were engaged from the beginning,” said Barb Chamberlain, executive director of Washington Bikes, a statewide advocacy group ( “Our role has been the actual on-the-ground identification of the potential routes and actual routes. That means all along the way, we’ve done local advocacy, working with bike groups if there is one. You need volunteers to do this.”

One of those volunteers is John Pope, of Anacortes. He “spearheaded” the effort for the route, rode the whole thing and chronicled his tour for Washington Bikes. His blog posts inspired my trip.

I spoke to Pope early in my trip and he gave me some pointers: Watch out for the steep, no-shoulder switchbacks west of Wauconda; enjoy Ione’s red bridge; have fun.

But not everyone can call Pope and get his rundown. That’s why there’s a need for official routes.

Saara Snow, of the Montana-based Adventure Cycling Association, said at their simplest the routes are way-finding tools for bike travelers. They inform rider to go this way and watch out for that.

Yet the routes, Snow said, are so much more.

“Being a U.S. Bicycle Route helps to show motorists that these roads are being used by a bicyclist, and that brings a new kind of awareness for the roads and their use,” she said.

Fixing up bike routes

Simple improvements make a difference along the way. Paula Reeves, a planner in the state transportation department, said the state was looking for “quick wins” in an era when funding for transportation infrastructure is limited.

That includes adding bike facilities at international border crossings, as part of Washington and British Columbia’s initiative to reduce greenhouse gas emissions at their border crossings. It includes adding signage to bike routes, and better street striping.

Reeves said the state was identifying places where shoulders could be widened, and perhaps using a different method to resurface roads than chip-seal, which can crowd the shoulder with a jagged, rough surface.

For Reeves, though, it’s less about the pavement improvements than what bicycle traveling and tourism can offer rural communities.

A recent study done by Tacoma-based Earth Economics and called “Economic Analysis of Outdoor Recreation in Washington State” stated that bicycle riding in general generated more than $3.1 billion in annual spending.

Biking advocates make the case that cyclists spend more time and money in rural communities along a route than motorists do.

For me on my ride, this was definitely true. A trip that would’ve taken a day in a car took 10 days on a bike. Every 40 to 60 miles, usually after a day of climbing, I pulled into some small town I had previously just driven through, or never been to before. After gorging myself on an inordinate amount of food, I found a campsite or hotel, cash in hand.

That’s the way it should be, said Washington Bike’s Chamberlain.

“It’s not like a race across America. You don’t have to do this as fast as possible,” she said.