Movie review of “Inferno”: Ron Howard and Tom Hanks return for a third bite of the Dan Brown apple, following “The Da Vinci Code” and “Angels & Demons,” with the further adventures of Robert Langdon, expert in religiously based arcana. Rating: 2 stars out of 4.
The first rule of chases: When being pursued through city streets by three burly fellows radiating evil intent, the last thing you want to do is leave the street and climb, climb, climb way up to the tippy top of a very tall tower. Because that will indeed be the last thing you do. Hey kids, it’s Humpty Dumpty time.
A character breaks this cardinal rule at the beginning of “Inferno,” and it’s basically all down to the pavement from there.
Ron Howard and Tom Hanks return for a third bite of the Dan Brown apple, following up on their collaborative adaptations of Brown’s best-selling “The Da Vinci Code” and “Angels & Demons” with the further adventures of Brown’s iconic protagonist Robert Langdon, expert in religiously based arcana.
Movie Review ★★
‘Inferno,’ with Tom Hanks, Felicity Jones, Irrfan Khan, Omar Sy, Ben Foster. Directed by Ron Howard, from a screenplay by David Koepp, based on the novel by Dan Brown. 121 minutes. Rated PG-13 for sequences of action and violence, disturbing images, some language, thematic elements and brief sensuality. Several theaters.
Starting with a chase, “Inferno” proceeds at a hyperfrantic pace as Langdon and a helpful young doctor (played by Felicity Jones) are hunted hither and thither through the scenic streets and historic (and scenic) buildings of Florence and Venice by a lady assassin disguised as a cop, by real cops, by members of the World Health Organization, by government security types and assorted thugs, mugs and other shady sorts.
Most Read Entertainment Stories
- 'America's Got Talent' finalist Benicio Bryant, Maple Valley's teen singing sensation, prepares to wow 'em
- Top 10 Seattle music events for fall 2019, from Lana Del Rey to The Who
- Why go to the theater? It's inconvenient. It can be uncomfortable. And here's why I love it.
- 'Downton Abbey' movie review: Fans of the TV series, this one's for you WATCH
- 7 best bets for theater in fall 2019 in the Seattle area
The chase, chase, chase pace is tiring, not least because it’s not clear who many of these people are and what agendas they’re following. Mixed-up confusion is the result. Apparently Howard and screenwriter David Koepp realized this because, at several points late in the picture, they hit the pause button to allow characters to deliver long expository speeches cluing Langdon in as to who’s who and what’s what.
Langdon is called on to use his vast knowledge of symbols to interpret telltales tied to Dante’s “Inferno” that will, he hopes, allow him to thwart a plot by a megalomaniacal tycoon (Ben Foster) to unleash a plague that will depopulate the world because, you know, overpopulation is bad. Time, the mogul maintains, to thin the herd.
Langdon’s efforts are complicated by the fact he’s suffering from that old thriller-movie standby: amnesia.
Really? Amnesia? These days that plot device only really works for Jason Bourne.
Langdon’s amnesia is of a highly selective sort. He can’t recall the word for coffee but does remember his gmail address and his password. Oh, and he also remembers all manner of esoteric details of Dante-related scholarship, the better to divine the significance of clues scattered like breadcrumbs throughout the movie.
Langdon’s amnesia afflicts him with terrible headaches and visions of hellish Dante-derived horrors, full of blood and disfigurement. And guess what? Those headaches are contagious. The amnesia scenes’ blurry imagery and jolt-cut editing may make the viewer wish to lie down in a dark room with a cold cloth on fevered forehead.
Somebody, get me an aspirin. Better make that two.