In "The Use and Abuse of Literature," Harvard English professor Marjorie Garber asks whether literature still matters in an age of electronic info bytes. Garber will discuss her book Thursday at Seattle's University Book Store with University of Washington English professor and "Reality Hunger" author David Shields.
‘The Use and Abuse of Literature’
by Marjorie Garber
Pantheon, 320 pp., $28.95
BOOK REVIEW |
Most Read Entertainment Stories
- Seattle’s Ijeoma Oluo calls out the elephant in the room in ‘Mediocre: The Dangerous Legacy of White Male America’
- Want to get in the holiday mood? Check out these 2020 holiday events in the Seattle area
- Here's how to watch the Westlake tree and Seattle Star lighting, and Seattle Center Winterfest
- Where to see holiday lights in the Seattle area in 2020
- Looking for the perfect gift for the bookworm in your life? Seattle’s indie booksellers suggest these 5 titles
In an age that prizes short bursts of electronic information, Harvard English professor Marjorie Garber asks whether literature still matters. As might be expected of someone who has spent her career teaching Shakespeare to undergraduates, she answers with a resounding “yes.”
Garber sets the stage for her examination of literature by citing a report from the National Endowment for the Arts, which found that less than half the adults responding to the 2002 U.S. Census had read any novels, short stories, poetry or plays in their free time.
To her credit, she doesn’t take this as a sign of the collapse of Western civilization; on the contrary, she acknowledges that someone who might not know the line “Do I dare to eat a peach?” — from T.S. Eliot’s great poem, “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” — may very well be fluent in the visual language of videos, film, television, advertising and rock music.
What scares her more than ignorance of Eliot is unmistakable evidence that the study of literature is no longer considered essential for a well-educated individual; it appears to have been pushed aside by science and technology.
Rather than studying the humanities to understand humanity, today’s college students, and even their professors, are more likely to look to the insights of neuroscience to grasp the complexities of the human mind.
For Garber, of course, literature does matter. “Language does change our world,” she writes. “It does make possible what we think and how we think it.” Echoing an argument made by the eminent literary critic Harold Bloom, Garber claims for literature a sort of stem cell-like power to generate fresh and new imaginative experiences in those who read it.
If you don’t believe her, here’s Virginia Woolf on why reading poetry can be a transformative experience: “Our being for a moment is centred and constricted, as in any violent shock of personal emotion.” And here is Eliot himself, to explain why poetry matters: “When a poet’s mind is perfectly equipped for its work, it is constantly amalgamating disparate experience … “
For anyone who’s taken a survey course in English literature, or, God forbid, majored in English, this book will send you back to the canon. Whether Garber and her English Department confederates can persuade a generation addicted to YouTube and Twitter to download Woolf, Eliot and Shakespeare to their Kindles remains to be seen.