Within hours of posting a draft plan to comply with a new federal education law, state officials pulled the document from its website and faced criticism from parents and teachers demanding more time to review it.
Update: The Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction early Wednesday re-released its draft Every Student Succeeds Act plan. The public has 30 days to submit comment on the proposal before the superintendent’s office next month submits it to the U.S. Department of Education for approval.
State education officials released, then recalled their plan for how Washington state will deal with the new federal education law, the Every Student Succeeds Act.
Already facing pressure to give the public more time to review the plan, the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction sent a news release early Monday declaring “changes are coming to education policy in Washington.” It invited the public to weigh in on a 241-page draft of the plan that would set new academic goals for students, outline support for teachers, overhaul the school accountability system and much more.
Most Read Stories
- Surprise! If you get a call from this man, it’s no scam. The state really has money for you.
- Forget Marie Kondo: There's a better, high-tech method to tidying up
- Canada's answer to Tesla is a $15,500 electric three-wheeler
- 'You mean the nicest guy in camp': Evan White is the future at first base for the Mariners
- How Puget Sound-area school districts will make up days lost to historic snowfall
But within about 90 minutes, the superintendent’s office removed the document from its website.
That excuse didn’t sit well with parents and teachers who, despite the lack of a plan, on Monday attended the first of a series of forums scheduled this month to gather feedback on it.
Deputy Superintendent Gil Mendoza, who hosted the Monday event at Highline High School, tried to assure the audience that they soon could access the draft plan again.
“Our plan is done. It’s in draft form, and it’s going to go out for public comment,” Mendoza said, adding that he and Superintendent Randy Dorn had “a miscommunication” over the weekend.
“He asked that I pull it down from the site because there were a couple things he wanted to finish. It will probably be up in the next day or two,” Mendoza said.
Some parents and teachers who successfully downloaded the draft plan before its removal shared early criticism of the proposal.
Emijah Smith, president of the parent-teacher association at Dearborn Park International Elementary School in Seattle, wondered why the plan didn’t call for holding schools accountable for racial disparities in student discipline until 2018-19. She wanted that sooner.
Others worried the plan wouldn’t provide enough protections for school librarians or children with special needs. And most agreed that they wanted the superintendent’s office to delay its self-imposed deadline of submitting its plan to the federal government. The plan doesn’t have to be submitted until March, but the superintendent’s office plans to send it in December.
The State Board of Education last week similarly urged Dorn to delay submission of the plan.
“Knowing what this policy means takes time,” said Maribel Montes De Oca, education organizer for the Seattle-based immigrant advocacy organization OneAmerica.
“Not only has this policy not been accessible to us, it also hasn’t been translated,” she said. “So if we’re talking about making it the most successful to the folks who are the most impacted, we need to make it accessible to them.”