At Wells Fargo’s annual meeting Tuesday, investors overwhelmingly voted to elect the company’s slate of directors, signed off on the bank’s executive pay and rejected a proposal that would have required the bank to report on risks associated with its compensation practices.
DES MOINES — A year ago, Wells Fargo & Co. shareholders voted in droves against some of the bank’s longest-serving board members, a revolt sparked by the scandal over unauthorized bank accounts.
But 12 months later, even as outrage against the bank continues amid new enforcement actions, shareholders stood with the company.
At Wells Fargo’s annual meeting Tuesday at a hotel in Des Moines, Iowa, investors overwhelmingly voted to elect the company’s slate of directors, signed off on the bank’s executive pay and rejected a proposal that would have required the bank to report on risks associated with its compensation practices.
All 12 directors — many of them recent additions to the board — who stood for election received nearly 90 percent of shareholders votes, according to preliminary results released at the close of the meeting. That’s a blow to bank critics, including protesters who marched outside the meeting, who had called for the ouster of more board members and Chief Executive Tim Sloan.
Most Read Business Stories
- Retail survivors: How four family-owned Washington shops have made it in the Amazon era
- The latest pricing glitch spooked Vanguard shareholders | Your Funds
- I shared my phone number. I learned I shouldn’t have.
- Worried about a recession? Protect yourself but don't panic
- Zombie debt: how collectors trick consumers into reviving dead debts
Sloan took the job after the accounts scandal broke in 2016 but is a longtime Wells Fargo executive and previously ran the commercial-banking business.
Tuesday’s votes stood in stark contrast to last year’s meeting, at which no director received more than 80 percent support and four — including the bank’s then-chairman, Stephen Sanger — received less than 60 percent in what Sanger described as “a clear message of dissatisfaction.” Corporate directors are typically elected with near-unanimous support.
California Treasurer John Chiang, who’s running for governor, was at the meeting and told fellow shareholders they should withhold votes for John Baker, who has been a director since 2009, one of few holdovers from before the accounts scandal. He served on a board committee that reviewed customer complaints and, Chiang said, should have known about the unauthorized-accounts problem long before it became public.
“I am here to deliver a message from the people of California: Integrity and trust matter,” he said. He argued that Baker and several former directors “tuned their backs on this metastasizing greed.”
Chiang also asked shareholders to withhold support for the bank’s executive-compensation packages, saying Sloan in particular does not deserve the $15 million in potential incentive compensation he was granted last year and calling him an insider and “champion of the old guard.”
“It is time for him to go,” Chiang said.
Board Chairwoman Betsy Duke defended Sloan, saying she believes he is “the right CEO for Wells Fargo.”
“He knows this company, he cares deeply about this company,” she said. “He was worked every day to make those changes within this company.”
Shareholders also did not approve a proposal asking the bank to report on risks associated with its incentive compensation system. Incentive pay tied to onerous sales goals was one of the factors that motivated Wells Fargo workers to open unauthorized accounts, and a former currency trader alleged in a recent lawsuit that similar incentives may have led to problems in the bank’s foreign-exchange business.
The proposal for a report on risks related to incentive pay was brought forward by New York state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli and supported by the influential shareholder advisory firm Institutional Shareholder Services. It received the support of 21.7 percent of votes, according to the early tally.