The leaders of United Airlines pilots union have agreed to accept a 15 percent pay cut and not oppose the elimination of their pension plan, setting a precedent both for negotiations...
CHICAGO The leaders of United Airlines pilots union have agreed to accept a 15 percent pay cut and not oppose the elimination of their pension plan, setting a precedent both for negotiations with United’s other unions and for rival airlines that also are trying to slash labor costs.
In exchange, United will make bigger contributions to a new retirement plan and issue the pilots $550 million in convertible notes once the carrier emerges from bankruptcy.
The union’s 6,400 members, who accepted a 30 percent pay cut last year, could begin voting on the latest concessions before the end of the month.
Most Read Stories
- Seattle’s income tax on the wealthy is illegal, judge rules
- Analysis: Five reasons the Seahawks waived Dwight Freeney WATCH
- 2 shot at Capitol Hill nightclub in Seattle
- 'I just can’t take these night games': Husky football fans tired of late games, with little notice
- Before losing cancer battle, Ben Cushing inspired Cougars, Huskies to band together
Other labor groups distanced themselves from the deal, and the federal agency that would have to take over United’s pension blasted the agreement because it would strengthen the airline’s effort to walk away from its obligations.
Until now, the pension was the single non-negotiable item for the Air Line Pilots Association. Members sacrificed pay and other benefits but never let elimination of their retirement plan to become a negotiating chip.
But Stephen Presser, the union’s investment banker, said helping United get out of bankruptcy requires unprecedented moves. The airline filed for Chapter 11 protection in December 2002.
In November, the airline told pilots it needed $191 million in annual savings as part of an effort to cut $725 million in costs a year. The new concessions would save United $180 million a year.
The concessions are difficult but the union was willing to work with the carrier because United has shown a willingness to cut costs in other areas, said Mark Bathurst, chairman of the union’s governing council.
“They’ve given us a series of nonlabor cost savings across the company,” he said. “They had to demonstrate a willingness and ability to save costs in other areas before they came to us.”
The airline is negotiating with all its labor groups. If savings can’t be found through labor talks, the airline has said it will ask a bankruptcy judge to throw out existing contracts.
United is encouraged by the tentative deal, Jake Brace, the airline’s chief financial officer, said following a bankruptcy-court hearing yesterday.
“We think the agreement we struck with the pilots meets our needs to produce a viable business plan,” he said.
If United demonstrates in court that its $8.3 billion pension debt must be erased for the company to survive, the obligation for the plans will fall to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. (PBGC).
But the federal agency, created 30 years ago as a safety net for workers, slowly is running out of money, and its deficits threaten to skyrocket because of problems in the steel and airline industries.
It said last month its deficit for single-employer plans had doubled in the last fiscal year, to a record $23.3 billion, even as underfunding of pensions nationwide climbed to $600 billion.
The PBGC pays pensions for workers whose former employers have abandoned plans, but typically at a reduced rate. If their pensions are taken over by the agency, many pilots would receive less than half what they expected for an annual pension.
Workers endorsing a plan that would terminate their own pensions “sets a dangerous precedent,” said Bradley Belt, the PBGC’s executive director.
“The company is making generous new pension promises even as it is refusing to honor its old pension promises,” he said. “Equally troublesome is the notion that the pilots’ union insists on the termination of the pension plans for other United employees.”