Between April and September, according to a new report, Washington farmers and other export-dependent producers saw foreign sales plummet between 20 percent and 28 percent over the same period a year ago because of widening U.S. trade disputes with China and other nations.
Roughly six months after the first big round of tariffs went into effect, the cost to Americans from the country’s widening trade disputes with China and other nations is rising — with the biggest hit, not surprisingly, falling on trade-dependent states like Washington.
Between April and September, according to a new report, Washington farmers and other export-dependent producers saw foreign sales plummet by between 20 and 28 percent over the same period last year. The losses stem from tariffs on U.S. exports imposed by China and other trading partners in retaliation for import tariffs levied by the Trump administration.
The report, prepared by a trade-consultant firm using U.S. trade and census data, was presented at a Wednesday panel in Seattle as part of a national “Tariffs Hurt the Heartland” campaign sponsored by U.S. commodities trade groups hoping to break the current trade impasse.
Among the Washington industries hardest hit in the trade war were agricultural producers, who were carefully targeted by China and other foreign governments as a way to pressure the Trump administration. That was especially true with perishable products like cherries, which must be exported during a narrow 11-week window.
Most Read Business Stories
- As Seattle's new hotels roll out automation to serve guests, workers worry
- Boeing discovers flaw in sought-after 737 MAX simulator, the same kind that Ethiopian Airlines had
- A war is brewing over lithium mining at the edge of Death Valley VIEW
- Ethiopian Airlines calls criticism of its pilots an effort to 'divert public attention' from Boeing 737 MAX flaws
- Make a home down payment without wrecking your finances
Last spring, just as the cherry harvest was starting, China retaliated against U.S. tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum by levying its own tariffs on U.S. farming goods, including cherries, said Frank Davis, an executive with Washington Fruit and Produce Co. in Yakima and a member of Wednesday’s panel.
The tariffs effectively closed off China to state cherry growers, who had to divert their product to other markets, such as South Korea, Taiwan, or the U.S. domestic market. But because these secondary markets were already well supplied with cherries, the extra shipments led to depressed prices and significant losses.
“It cut us in half,” said Davis, who noted that state cherry sales to China dropped from 3.2 million cartons in 2017 to 1.6 million cartons in 2018. All told, Davis said, tariffs cost state cherry growers an estimated $60 million to $80 million in forgone profits. Without the tariffs, “we could have had a tremendous year,” Davis said. “But we ended up having an average year.”
Another less-than-tremendous result may await Washington’s apple growers, who recently finished their harvest and are now just testing the newly tariffed export market. State apple officials estimate that existing and threatened tariffs with Mexico, China and India, which together account for more than half of state exports, could mean between $120 million and $130 million in lost potential profits, said Davis, who is also a member of the state apple commission.
Wednesday’s panel, one of a series of “town halls” held around the country, was intended to increase public pressure on lawmakers to resolve the trade dispute by pushing the White House back to the negotiating table. “We don’t want a handout from government,” said Davis, referring to recent moves to give government subsidies to trade-impacted industries. “We just don’t want our agriculture to be used as a pawn.”