Q: Where can I find Wall Street’s projections for a company’s upcoming quarterly report?
A: Expected earnings are published at a variety of online sites, such as finance.yahoo.com. (Enter a company’s ticker symbol there, and then click on “Analyst Estimates” on the next page.)
But consider not paying too much attention to these guesses. Many times they’re based on comments and guidance from the company itself. If a company is telling analysts what it expects to earn, and then earns it or exceeds the estimate, how impressive is that, really?
Most Read Business Stories
- The penthouse atop Smith Tower is on the rental market for the first time
- Downtowns will be back, but Seattle has choices to make
- Boutique cruise line Windstar will move its Seattle headquarters to Miami
- Washington state ‘literally failed workers,’ and fixing the unemployment system won't be easy
- J&J’s 1-dose shot cleared, giving US 3rd COVID-19 vaccine
Fuller analyst reports, though, sometimes available via your brokerage, can be informative. They can deliver insights into a company’s health and competitive position as well as the challenges facing its industry.
Just be wary of estimates of future numbers, as the future is hard to predict accurately. And take ratings such as “strong buy” and “outperform” with a grain of salt, too. Analysts issue very few “sell” ratings, as they’d rather not tick off companies that might give their employers business.
Q: What are “balanced” mutual funds, and should I invest in them?
A: Balanced funds hold both stocks and bonds, offering gains from stock appreciation and stock dividends, as well as income from bond interest.
Many fund families offer balanced funds, often with different asset mixes. The Vanguard Balanced Index Fund, for example, aims to be about 60 percent stocks and 40 percent bonds.
You don’t necessarily need a balanced fund, since you can invest in separate stock and bond funds. Remember, too, to include some international exposure, for diversification. (Many foreign economies are growing much faster than America’s.)
Dear Fool: Global Crossing was one of my stupidest investments. I lost five grand between the tech boom of the 1990s and the tech bust of 2000. I believed all the company’s hype about laying down fiber-optic cables around the world.
The Fool responds: Well, Global Crossing did have a network of fiber-optic cable. But that never stopped it from posting many years of net losses. The company failed spectacularly in 2002, as it filed for bankruptcy protection after having once been valued at more than $80 billion. It emerged from bankruptcy in 2004 with new shares — old shares became worthless, leaving those investors out of luck, as often happens with bankruptcies.
When investing, try to separate a company’s grand visions and projections from its actual accomplishments and financial performance. Favor competitive advantages — and profits.
Discount retailer Target (NYSE: TGT) lost some steam last month after costs related to its expansion into Canada took a toll on its third-quarter earnings. That created an opportunity for buy-to-hold investors.
Target now has 124 stores open in Canada (along with roughly 1,800 in the U.S.), which should help accelerate its earnings growth. They’re expected to contribute as much as 10 percent of profits by 2017. Moreover, research from Morningstar indicates that the retailer is on track to generate $100 billion in sales that year, up from $75 billion this year.
The company’s strategy in recent years has been to compete against peers with low prices — but also to focus on design more than they do, bringing in brand-name designers to create special merchandise lines. Target’s Thanksgiving shopping results were “strong,” per company reports.
Not everything is rosy, though, as sales aren’t growing at a blistering pace, its profit margins have shrunk in recent years, and the company does face able competition.
But Target has paid a dividend for 46 years, upping it by a hefty 19 percent in June. The stock recently yielded 2.7 percent.
That’s encouraging, as dividend stocks tend to outperform non-dividend-paying stocks over the long run.