The maker of BlackBerry e-mail devices Wednesday lost an emergency Supreme Court appeal that sought to put a long-running patent suit against...
WASHINGTON — The maker of BlackBerry e-mail devices Wednesday lost an emergency Supreme Court appeal that sought to put a long-running patent suit against the company on hold.
Research In Motion (RIM) is appealing an infringement verdict to the high court and wanted the lawsuit stalled while the appeal was pending. Chief Justice John Roberts denied the request for a stay, without comment.
Still, shares of the Canadian company’s stock rose 92 cents, or 1.6 percent, to close at $58.32 Wednesday on the Nasdaq Stock Market.
Lawyers for RIM had argued its business would be harmed irreparably if the court did not delay the return of the case to the lower court where the company was found guilty in 2003 of violating patents held by Arlington, Va., company NTP.
Most Read Stories
- Retired Alabama cop on Roy Moore: ‘We were also told to ... make sure that he didn’t hang around the cheerleaders’
- A Washington syrah was named second best wine in the world
- Expect record-high temps, 'copious rain' in Seattle area as we head toward Thanksgiving VIEW
- Fake field goal? An errant challenge? Blame Pete Carroll for Seahawks' loss to Atlanta
- Bicyclist dies in hit-and-run crash in Sodo, police say
The loss Wednesday, which had been expected, does not say anything about a more significant issue, whether the Supreme Court will hear RIM’s appeal.
The decision comes just days after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., also refused to issue a stay.
In August, the appeals court upheld most of the 2003 verdict but directed the trial judge to examine whether certain errors tainted the jury’s deliberations.
The verdict has raised the prospect RIM could be forced to stop selling its popular handhelds and wireless e-mail service.
The lower court also will consider RIM’s bid to enforce an apparent settlement reached earlier this year calling for a $450 million payment to NTP, which says the terms were never finalized.
RIM, based in Waterloo, Ont., said in a statement, “While further review by the Supreme Court is generally uncommon, RIM continues to believe this case raises significant national and international issues warranting further appellate review.”
NTP had filed arguments with the Supreme Court earlier Wednesday, accusing RIM of trying to drag the case out.
“RIM intends to take as much time as possible, seek as many extensions as possible, and defer consideration of its [appeal] until after the present Supreme Court term ends next year,” its filing said.
The court proceedings are separate from deliberations by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, which recently issued preliminary rejections of the five NTP patents that RIM was found to have violated in the lawsuit.
The BlackBerry maker has asserted the patent office’s actions hold enough weight to sway the court case.
NTP has dismissed them as a common formality in the agency’s lengthy review process.