The online music-streaming service filed a prospectus to sell shares on the New York Stock Exchange, an indication of the imminent arrival of one of the most anticipated technology stocks in years.
Spotify has already won over the music industry, and listeners worldwide, with an online-streaming service that makes millions of songs instantly available. Now, it is ready to test its business model on Wall Street.
On Wednesday, the company filed a prospectus to sell shares on the New York Stock Exchange, an indication of the imminent arrival of one of the most anticipated technology stocks in years.
It was also a signal of the maturation of the streaming market that has already begun to revive the long-struggling music industry.
Instead of a traditional initial public offering, Spotify will, as expected, pursue a direct listing of its shares, an unusual process in which no new stock is issued — and therefore no money is raised. However, existing investors and insiders can trade their shares on the open market.
Most Read Business Stories
- FAA faces dilemma over 737 MAX wiring flaw that Boeing missed
- Amazon has 37,000 job listings — maybe its most ever — in Seattle, India and across the globe
- As Seattleites and their money flow south, Tacoma residents grapple with changing neighborhoods
- 5 home improvements that may not pay off when you sell
- Tesla repeatedly veered toward spot where engineer later crashed and died, investigators say
But because Spotify is eschewing Wall Street banks to manage the raising of new capital, the listing could face a rockier reception in the markets.
Those banks typically spend weeks assessing investor demand for a company’s shares and try to match the amount that hits the market to ensure the shares are supported.
According to the prospectus, investors trading Spotify’s shares in private transactions have valued the company as highly as $23 billion. Spotify’s shares will be traded under the ticker symbol SPOT, but there is no indication of when that will begin.
The company, showing no shortage of ambition, said its mission was “to unlock the potential of human creativity by giving a million creative artists the opportunity to live off their art and billions of fans the opportunity to enjoy and be inspired by these creators.”
For the music industry, Spotify — and the streaming model it has championed — has been a powerful engine. After more than a decade of decline, the global music market began to turn around in 2015, just as streaming began to take hold.
In the United States, for example, streaming now accounts for about two-thirds of recorded music revenues, according to the Recording Industry Association of America, and streaming platforms like Spotify, Apple Music, YouTube and SoundCloud have become the new outlets where stars develop and hits are minted.
Even so, many artists remain skeptical of the streaming economy, which heavily rewards mainstream hits but has drawn complaints from other songwriters and musicians, particularly those outside the sphere of pop, who feel they are not being adequately compensated for their work.
Spotify’s prospectus is the most detailed disclosure the company has given about its business.
According to the filing, Spotify, which began its streaming service in Sweden in 2008 and came to the United States three years later, had nearly $5 billion in revenue in 2017, up 38.6 percent from the year before. In 2016, it had grown by 52 percent.
By the end of 2017, Spotify, whose full name is Spotify Technology, had 159 million active users, including 71 million who pay for subscriptions; the rest, using the “freemium” model that has become Spotify’s marketing hallmark, get free access to music but are subjected to advertisements.
As quickly as Spotify has grown, though, so have its losses.
Last year, it had a net loss of $1.5 billion, up from about $650 million the year before. Its largest expense, by far, is the cost of licenses from record companies and music publishers.
Through the end of last year, the company had paid more than $10 billion in music royalties since its inception, and its “churn” — a measure of how many paying users cancel each month — has been steadily declining, to 5.5 percent in 2017 from 7.7 percent in 2015.
The largest stakes are owned by its two founders: Daniel Ek, the chief executive and the company’s public face, and Martin Lorentzon, who holds no executive position.
In addition to their shares, they have “beneficiary certificates” granting them extra voting rights. In total, Ek has 37.3 percent voting power over the company, and Lorentzon 43.1 percent, according to the prospectus.