Qualcomm’s sale to Singapore-based Broadcom could hurt the chipmaker’s competitiveness by reducing research and development, which would threaten U.S. security, Treasury said in a March 5 letter released by Qualcomm on Tuesday.
Broadcom’s hostile-takeover attempt of Qualcomm could pose a national-security risk because of Qualcomm’s leadership in developing critical semiconductor technology, according to the U.S. Treasury Department, setting up a potentially insurmountable hurdle to getting a deal done.
Qualcomm’s sale to Singapore-based Broadcom could hurt the chipmaker’s competitiveness by reducing research and development, which would threaten U.S. security, Treasury said in a March 5 letter released by Qualcomm Tuesday. Harm to Qualcomm’s innovation would allow China to expand its influence in key wireless technology, the government said.
The U.S. “has identified potential national security concerns that warrant a full investigation of the proposed transaction,” Treasury said. “Articulation of the potential national security concerns, in significant part, is classified.”
Qualcomm on Monday postponed a shareholder vote on Broadcom’s nominees for Qualcomm’s board after the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S., which Treasury leads, ordered a delay to review the deal. Broadcom is on track to win all six of the seats it’s seeking, Bloomberg reported, giving it a majority of the board to push ahead with its hostile $117 billion bid.
Most Read Business Stories
- Boeing delivers first 737 jet from completion center in China
- As America retreats, China moves to create a new world order | Jon Talton
- Workers start paying for Washington’s new paid-leave law next month. Here’s how it works.
- Five steps to reduce your vulnerability to a hacker | Q&A with Patrick Marshall
- Apple to expand Seattle office to more than 1,000 workers
The government’s scrutiny of the proposed combination of the two chipmakers threatens to derail what would be the biggest transaction in the history of technology. It lends weight to Qualcomm’s argument that the hostile bid would struggle to get regulatory sign off.
The investigation by investment committee, which considers national-security risks to foreign acquisitions of U.S. companies, came after Qualcomm filed a notice with the panel seeking a review. Broadcom blasted the move as a “blatant, desperate act” to entrench its incumbent board of directors.
Broadcom said it’s cooperating with the review by the investment committee.
“There can be no question that an American Broadcom-Qualcomm combination will provide far more resources for investments and development,” Broadcom said in a statement. “Entrusting this effort to a failing Qualcomm management who lacks the support of its owners, and that pays out much of its excess cash flow in fines as a result of serial lawbreaking, would not be in America’s long-term interests.”
The investment committee, led by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, has become more demanding under President Donald Trump, according to Brian Fleming, a lawyer at Miller & Chevalier Chartered in Washington, D.C., who previously worked in the Justice Department’s national-security division.
“The risk tolerance has been lowered significantly in the current administration,” Fleming said. “Whereas it may have been the case in the previous administration that certain risks could be tolerated and perhaps addressed through mitigation those risks are not as well tolerated any more, and it is a higher bar you have to clear.”
The committee can approve or propose changes to deals, but only the president can block a transaction on national-security grounds. Trump signed an executive order blocking the sale of Lattice Semiconductor to a Chinese-backed investor in September. The panel doesn’t confirm or comment on its work.
In its letter, Treasury heaped praise on Qualcomm for having “led the mobile revolution in digital communications technologies.” The government said it fears an acquisition by Broadcom could threaten Qualcomm’s competitiveness. The debt Broadcom would need to finance the deal would increase pressure to earn short-term profits at the expense of spending on research and development, according to the letter.
If Qualcomm’s position is weakened, Treasury said, Chinese companies like Huawei Technologies would gain an opening to become dominant. Huawei has long been seen by the U.S. as a security threat.
Treasury also cited Qualcomm’s contracts with U.S. government agencies with national-security responsibilities. Qualcomm has “active sole source classified prime contracts” with the Pentagon, according to the letter.
“Qualcomm’s partnership with the United States government encompasses efforts to address cybersecurity in the next generation of wireless, 5G, and the Internet of Things,” Treasury said. “Limitation or cessation of supply of Qualcomm products or services to the U.S. government could have a detrimental impact on national security.”