Discussions of the bloodshed in Darfur or issues such as climate change make regular appearances in the world of politics, but lately investors...
NEW YORK — Discussions of the bloodshed in Darfur or issues such as climate change make regular appearances in the world of politics, but lately investors might notice that these issues have wedged their way into often dry financial disclosures.
The proxy voting forms that shareholders of mutual funds or individual stocks receive are often tossed aside as just plain boring. But investors might be surprised by the shadow that politics casts on some ballot items.
Shareholders of Fidelity Investments’ huge Contrafund, which has about $73 billion in assets, are now casting votes ahead of the fund’s Wednesday meeting on whether Fidelity should weed out holdings in companies that “substantially contribute to genocide, patterns of extraordinary and egregious violations of human rights or crimes against humanity.”
Contrafund is one of several Fidelity funds whose shareholders are voting on proposals aimed at preventing investment in companies like PetroChina. Fidelity last year sold the bulk of its holdings in the Chinese oil company but advocates are urging Fidelity to outright ban ownership of the shares.
Most Read Business Stories
- The penthouse atop Smith Tower is on the rental market for the first time
- Downtowns will be back, but Seattle has choices to make
- Boutique cruise line Windstar will move its Seattle headquarters to Miami
- J&J’s 1-dose shot cleared, giving US 3rd COVID-19 vaccine
- Washington state ‘literally failed workers,’ and fixing the unemployment system won't be easy
Critics have said PetroChina has sizable ties to the government-owned oil industry in Sudan, the African nation that the U.S. government has said is complicit in genocide there.
Conflicts in far-off places aren’t the only somewhat unusual items popping up on proxy ballots.
The Investor Network on Climate Risk, an alliance of 60 institutional investors whose assets reach more than $5 trillion, said this month that investors have filed 54 shareholder resolutions on global warming with U.S. companies, nearly double the number of such filings two years ago.
The petitions filed with companies such as Exxon Mobil and US Airways Group seek greater disclosure on how these businesses might respond, for example, to regulation of greenhouse gases or increased demand for more energy-efficient services. Some petitions are asking companies to set emissions-reduction targets.
“We view these things as long-term risks,” Jack Ehnes, chief executive at the California State Teachers’ Retirement System, said of the difficulties companies such as those in the energy sector could face from a warming planet.
CalSTRS, with assets of about $167 billion, is the nation’s second largest public-pension fund behind the California Public Employees’ Retirement System and filed resolutions on climate change for the first time this year.
Even those who are agnostic on the science of climate change should see a business risk from failing to plan for climate change, he said.
“If it is a cause, it’s a cause of protecting our portfolio and maximizing our returns,” Ehnes said. “I think the fiduciary connection here is pretty solid.”
In the case of the genocide resolution, Fidelity is recommending investors vote against the proposal. Fidelity, the nation’s largest mutual-fund company, has said the proposal would limit investments that are legal under U.S. law.