Patagonia, maker of high-end outdoor gear, says it's riding a growth curve with 14 new stores opened last year, bringing to 88 its wholly owned retail outlets throughout the world, including the only one in Washington state at 2100 Second Ave. in Seattle.

Share story


High-end outdoor clothier and gear maker Patagonia is out to prove that a company can generate strong sales while being nearly fanatical about environmental concerns.

The first major clothier to make fleece jackets out of recycled bottles, it harnesses nearly a third of the power for its headquarters and adjoining child-care center from solar. And it donates 1 percent of its sales to environmental causes.

With Patagonia being a privately held company, its finances are not public, but it says it’s riding a growth curve. It opened 14 new stores last year, bringing to 88 its wholly owned retail outlets throughout the world, including the only one in Washington state at 2100 Second Ave. in Seattle.

Executives said the company had $540 million in sales in the 12 months that ended in April, an increase of more than 30 percent over the same period a year earlier.

Furthermore, they said, Patagonia has doubled revenue and tripled profit since 2008.

But is it fair to say that the environmental dedication of the company is a key to its claimed success?

Patagonia executives say yes.

Chief Executive Casey Sheahan said customers were willing to pay $25 for a T-shirt, $20 for wool socks and $180 for a light jacket because they knew Patagonia inflicted less damage on the environment than other clothing makers did.

And, he said, other companies are catching on.

“I think a lot of big companies are doing things like this because it’s a better way of doing business,” he said as he strolled company headquarters, where clothing designers shuffle around in flip-flops while other workers shape surfboards that they test off a nearby beach.

Ventura, Calif.-based Patagonia co-founded the Sustainable Apparel Coalition, a group of retailers and clothiers, including Target, Wal-Mart and Levi Strauss, that is committed to slashing the environmental impact of their operations.

But analysts said Patagonia’s eco-friendly philosophy was probably only one factor in the company’s ability to grow.

More important, said Richard Jaffe, a retail and apparel analyst with investment firm Stifel Nicolaus & Co., is that Patagonia has a reputation for making products a cut above much of the competition.

“They are doing things incrementally better,” Jaffe said.

Patagonia may also be benefiting from an overall increase in sales in outdoor goods across the country. During the recession, industry experts say, many Americans turned to outdoor recreation as a cheaper alternative to diversions such as foreign travel.

Outdoor-product sales in the U.S. totaled $25.3 billion in 2011, representing an increase of nearly 11 percent compared with 2010, according to the Outdoor Industry Association, a trade group for outdoor retailers. In the same period, overall retail sales grew only about 5 percent, according to the National Retail Federation.

“Sales numbers were insane over the past few years,” said Avery Stonich, a spokeswoman for the Outdoor Industry Association. “The ‘stay-cations’ had a big impact on those sales numbers.”

Patagonia also benefited from some moves it made.

The company previously concentrated on rugged clothing for hiking and rock climbing. But about eight years ago it introduced a line of surf-inspired clothing and beach products, including surfboards, that have proved popular.

Patagonia also cut overhead by consolidating some global factories and putting more focus on Internet sales.

But even Patagonia’s founder and sole owner, Yvon Chouinard, 73, said the company was not likely to keep up its current growth pace. He called Patagonia’s recent jump in revenue an aberration, fueled partly by the recession.

Chouinard took a step to try to ensure that the environment commitment continues, even beyond his demise.

On Jan. 3, Chouinard became the first head of a company in California to file “benefit corporation” papers.

Traditionally, for-profit companies are required to serve the interests of shareholders above all. But a new law created the category of “benefit corporation” to allow such companies to adopt policies that “create a material positive impact on society and the environment.”

It was designed to protect a company from shareholder lawsuits saying that environmental efforts dilute the value of stock.

Chouinard said he made the move so that if Patagonia became a public company after he and his wife died, it would continue to donate to environmental causes without fear of being sued by shareholders.

“Now I can say what our values are, and that forever the company must continue to donate 1 percent of sales,” he said.

His prediction of slowing sales growth for Patagonia was of less concern.

“It makes no difference to me,” Chouinard said, “as long as we stay out of debt.”