NEW YORK — The shocking first-quarter loss at Wachovia, a company long viewed as a relatively conservative player during the mortgage...
NEW YORK — The shocking first-quarter loss at Wachovia, a company long viewed as a relatively conservative player during the mortgage boom, suggests 2008 will be at best a rebuilding year even for the nation’s better-positioned banks.
Results this week from large banks such as Washington Mutual, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo should shed more light on how much fixing-up the industry has to do.
So far, it’s not looking pretty. That means fewer loans for consumers, skimpier dividends for shareholders and more job cuts.
Wachovia’s $393 million quarterly loss was accompanied by a 41 percent dividend cut, plans to eliminate 500 jobs in its corporate and investment bank, and a move to sell $7 billion worth of stock.
Most Read Business Stories
- FAA safety engineer goes public to slam the agency's oversight of Boeing's 737 MAX
- MacKenzie Scott marries Seattle teacher after Bezos divorce
- Google puts lid on cookie jar and ends an internet era | Commentary
- 55,000 in Washington state may have to pay back thousands in jobless benefits
- Microsoft’s $10 billion Pentagon deal at risk amid Amazon fight
Many banks have already tried to raise cash through stake sales. Wachovia itself raised $8.3 billion earlier this year, Citi has raised about $20 billion, and Seattle-based WaMu has raised $7.2 billion, just to name a few.
But investors are not convinced banks have enough cash to survive what is expected to be a tough year for consumer credit.
Wachovia’s loss — brought on by a $2 billion asset write-down and provisions of $2.8 billion for anticipated credit losses — was viewed as a harbinger for the industry, and sent bank shares tumbling on Monday.
“What you’re seeing is a taste of things to come,” said Len Blum, managing director at Westwood Capital and former managing director of Prudential Securities’ investment-banking group.
Already, analysts were forecasting first-quarter losses at Washington Mutual and Citigroup, which report today and Friday, respectively.
JPMorgan and Wells Fargo are expected to post profits Wednesday, but much smaller ones than they notched a year earlier.
Citi, for one, is expected to write down its portfolio by anywhere between $10 billion and $20 billion.
All told, the global financial industry has written down assets by some $190 billion over the past few quarters. Last week, the International Monetary Fund estimated write-downs will total nearly $1 trillion in a couple of years.
“I think it’s going to get a lot worse before it gets better,” Blum said. “I don’t think any bank is immune from this.”
The reasons, he said, are that the housing market is nowhere near a rebound and consumers are buried under debt, having taken on $6.9 trillion between 2000 and 2006 to more than double what they owed previously.
It’s not just subprime mortgages causing problems.
In Wachovia’s report, it said defaults are increasing for option adjustable-rate mortgages — where the rates change monthly and consumers can defer payments — and Alt-A mortgages, which are for people with better credit than subprime borrowers but who are not prime.
Anticipated losses in option ARMs — which operate like a mortgage with a home-equity loan embedded in it — do not bode well for home-equity loans, said Keefe Bruyette & Woods bank analyst Fred Cannon.
WaMu, Wells Fargo and Bank of America have particularly large exposure to home-equity loans. JPMorgan has already warned it expects to write off $450 million in the first quarter.
“While subprime was kept to a fairly small share of assets, exposure to home equity is much more significant,” Cannon said. “Home-equity loans for a lot of consumers became a savings account.”
So with banks paring back lines of home-equity credit, it’s inevitable defaults are going to rise in an expanding swath of debt, from auto loans to credit cards to personal loans.
And as defaults rise, banks will need to sock away more cash to prepare for future losses. Wachovia’s big provision suggests banks are realizing they can no longer rely on historical models for reserving.
“When there’s a radical shift, the models are out the window,” said SNL Financial banking analyst John McCune.
As more banks alter their loan-loss modeling, he said, “I think it’s going to show that they haven’t been provisioning aggressively. … They’re surely under-reserved for all this.”